In Heidegger’s Children, Richard Wolin quotes Hans Jonas on why he should have seen Heidegger’s Nazism earlier: it’s embedded in Heidegger’s talk of “resoluteness” and “decisiveness.” Says Jonas, whereas Heidegger accused idealist philosophy of being a step removed from the world,
one could accuse him of something much more serious: the absolute formalism of his decisionism, where decision as such becomes the highest virtue.” (132)
If this is right (and it’s been too long since I read Being and Time to be sure), it means Heidegger gives us no way of distinguishing a “resolute decision” to support the worst of German nationalism from a decision to work in a refugee camp or to definitely go on the Atkins diet next year.
I seem to recall this Cluetrain book that talks about the importance of passion. And in that it’s echoing Tom Peters’ call for passionate commitment to serving one’s customers. (I like Peters’ new book, Re-Imagine, btw.) Isn’t Cluetrain guilty of the same content-free call for a form of commitment?
Granted, we’re not talking about Nazism here, but what do you do with a pointy-haired boss who is passionate about creating a truly oppressive, soul-less business environment for the people who report to him? It’d be foollish to deny that PHB’s can ever be passionate. There are Taylorist guys with stopwatches dedicated to squeezing the life out of an organization who are completely committed to what they’re doing: They spend their spare time reading about it, they can’t wait to tell you about it, and they sleep well at night convinced that every day they’re making the world a little better.
So, no, passion isn’t enough. Passionate oppression is no better than dispassionate oppression. (It might be worse. I don’t know.) But decisiveness is often the opposite of passion. It wants to end the suspense and take an act, any act. It doesn’t like the doubt and uncertainty that is built into passion because decisiveness doesn’t like possibility. It wants the future to be nailed down, and the decision is the first bang of the hammer. Decisiveness is essentially disengaged from the openness that is the future. Passion is the embrace of that openness. Just think about the difference between a manager who is overly-decisive and one who is passionate about the company’s reason for existence.
Passion by itself isn’t enough: Some of them Nazis were pretty damn passionate. But pound for pound, I’ll take passion over decisiveness any day.
Categories:
misc Tagged with:
misc Date: November 24th, 2003
dw