Joho the Blog » Jim’s Big, Shared Ego

Jim’s Big, Shared Ego

The Boston Globe writes up the local band Jim’s Big Ego because it encourages people to share the band’s files. In September, they released an album under a Creative Commons license and it’s been their biggest seller. In fact, Creative Commons and the band are holding a contest to find the most creative remix of their paean to mixing, “Mix Tape.” One of the band members, Jim Infantino, talks about “community-based art patronage”: “When you as a band act in good faith, you invite your fans to act in good faith.”

I love all this, but I so don’t believe that patronage — a fancy name for a tip jar — is going to be the way we keep our artists alive. There will be some successes that way, but I think we need a more structured way of paying, such as the EFF’s suggestion that online music adopt an ASCAP/BMI model. But I ain’t no stinking economist so, thankfully, I don’t have to pretend to have a real opinion about this.

(BTW, the group’s site let’s you stream all of their music. The first item on the playlist when I tuned in was a track that archly raises the musical question: “After all, isn’t God an angry white guy?”)

Previous: « || Next: »

3 Responses to “Jim’s Big, Shared Ego”

  1. No, a legislative solution will be captured by the big labels as usual – ask Jims Big Ego how much they ahve received from ASCAP/BMI.
    Sampling doesn’t work in a power-law distributed quantity, but peopela re smarter than that, and will preferentially pay JBE for their music over the already well-funded majors.

    And go read http://mediagora.com again, OK?

  2. If the album they released under a Creative Commons license has been their biggest seller, why ask why?

  3. There seems to, There seems to?There seems to, There seems to.There seems to, There seems to.There seems to seo, There seems to There seems to.There seems to, There seems to.,

Leave a Reply


Web Joho only

Comments (RSS).  RSS icon

Switch to our mobile site