David Isenberg points out that if you do an image search on “tiananmen” at Google.cn, you get tourist photos, while if you search on “tiananmen” at non-Chinese Google, you get the uncensored images we expect…and, most surprisingly, if you search Google.cn for “Tiananmen” (note the initial capital) you get the uncensored photos. Fascinating. (David acknowledges Sid Karin and Sam Smith.) [Tags: china google politics digital rights]

18 Comments »

Brad Patrick is giving a Tuesday lunchtime talk at the Berkman. He’s outside counsel to the Wikimedia Foundation, the group that owns Wikipedia. (Brad reminds us that Wikipedia needs a ®, which means I’d rather not use it.) Wikipedia is heading towards having its millionth article. [The millionth article ought to be "The Millionth Wikipedia Article."]

Wikipedia volunteers include: users, editors, administrators, stewards, arbCom (arbitration committee) and OTRS (Open-source Ticket Request System?). A global but small team of lawyers handles the legal issues.

Some questions and answers:

Wikipedia only keeps one cookie, identifying your user name. Server logs are kept for several months.

About 15,000 people have made ten or more edits to the English version, and about twice that for worldwide.

Q: Does the fact that victims of libel could edit the entries themselves change the legal aspects?
A: This question is being addressed. E.g., A German court is wondering if Wikipedia has any obligation not to print the name of a dead hacker known as Tron.

Q: Why is Wikimedia insisting on the ®?
A: [Not Brad] Open software groups have trademarks, e.g., Mozilla, Apache, etc.

Q: When does a user complaint become something that is Wikipedia’s legal responsibility?
A: We usually have the tools in place to respond to legitimate complaints. The intent of the foundation is through the community of users and dialogue to get better articles. When it can’t, it goes to the Help Desk.

Q: How about how you operate in rights restricted countries?
A: I haven’t been involved in Wikipedia’s relationship with China. It’s an ongoing issue, continuing negotiation.

Q: How often are you getting sued these days?
A: At the moment, there’s no pending lawsuits in the US. [Wow!]

Q: Lots of places republish Wikipedia content, which is fine under the terms of the GFDL. Do you see any abuses of that?
A: No.
Q: Suppose they use content and aren’t compliant with the license?
A: The primary problem is who is going to do the policing? The foundation isn’t out to hunt down every users of Wikipedia content that isn’t doing so according to Hoyle. It’s part of the process.

[Tags: wikipedia berkman digital+rights]

2 Comments »

All photos taken at the Empire State Building gift shop.

Statue of Liberty through the lens of a pay-per-view telescope

[Tags: empire state building nyc photos]

2 Comments »

Coming up with a “code of ethics” for bloggers makes about as much sense as coming up with a code of ethics for people who say things. The diversity of blogs makes a code of ethics not even a pipe dream but a pipe nightmare.

But…

We in fact do have some ethical expectations for people who say things. We expect you not to lie (without good cause), to let us know if you know you’re unreasonably biased (e.g., “Of course, that company does pay my salary” or “But, I was married to her for six years, so maybe that’s biased me”), and be capable of responding to a well-intentioned question without socking us in the nose. We don’t need a Code of Good Talking to formalize that. Rather, those are the conditions that enable us to converse in the first place.

There are some facts about blogs that pertain pretty generally, and those facts — features of the landscape, if you prefer — give rise to what I think are some reasonable ethical expectations. For example:

Nothing too surprising in this list of rules of thumb, of course. It’s the tie back to facts that interests me. Is doesn’t imply Ought, but Is whips Ought into condition.

[Tags: blogging ethics]

8 Comments »

Having asked for your help trying to figure out what the four of us should do in NYC this past weekend, here are some highlights of what we ended up doing. Keep in mind our multiple restrictions: two shabbos-keepers, four vegetarians, one crutch-assisted walker, one whiny adult…

On Saturday we got up late and went to the Museum of Modern Art’s Pixar exhibit. (We’d bought tickets ahead of time online, but there wasn’t much of a line.) Somewhat disappointing. The wide-wide-wide screen movie they put together for the exhibit was mesmerizing and makes you wish Pixar gave itself permission to do a non-commercial film. The rest consisted mainly of items to please fans, although some of the items by themselves were beautiful, clever, or intricate in their design. Surprisingly little on the how-to, which was ok with me, Still, I was hoping to see more of Pixar-as-art…whatever that means.

We also spent some time on the fifth floor of the MoMA, which is hard to beat. (By the way, the MoMA is poorly designed for wheelchair access, at least in the special exhibit space.)

We went up the Empire State Building. Ten on a Sunday morning turns out to be a good time to go: No lines. The building is still very tall. (I plan on posting some photos soon to prove that point.)

The Darwin exhibit at the Museum of Natural History was good but a little disappointing, focusing more on eye candy than on telling us how he got to his idea. It covered big influences, such as the revolution in geology, Darwin’s observation of artificial selection, and Malthus’ writings, way too briefly. It was more about Darwin as an isolated genius.

We also went to the planetarium and saw a by-the-numbers show that starts with our night sky (spectacular) and then zooms out to the farthest edges, narrated by Tom Hanks presumably because Morgan Freeman was unavailable. It sounds better than it is: Our 15-year-old son came out of it feeling that he hadn’t learned much. Me too. The ramp around the planetarium provides a walkable timeline of the universe that’s pretty interesting, and the floor around it a gives helpful comparisons … “If the planetarium were Jupiter, this bubble would be the size of Google’s market cap”… that type of thing.

We had a great dinner at the Udipi Palace, one of five Indian kosher vegetarian restaurants within a block. How weird is that? The food was delicious and the waiter (owner?) was very helpful. And, for NY, pretty cheap.

We also spent a lot of time wandering around. The weather was eerily good for January, and the wandering was fantastic.

NOTES:

1. The plug converters (US to Europe) range in price from $20 to $4 in the frequent electronics rip-off stores in NY.

2. Random overheard comment made by a middle-aged man to his companions as they entered the observatory of the Empire State Building: “This building is going to be really tall by the time I get done with it.” Say wha’??

[Tags: nyc the big apple gotham]

5 Comments »

David Stephenson has noted some small changes at the Center for Disease Control site that would be useful if the site were to become a center for information during a pandemic such as we may well be facing with bird flu. They’re small changes that will be useful in any case because they make it easier to find fresh information. [Tags: cdc avian flu david stephenson]

1 Comment »

My senators — Kennedy and Kerry — are doing their duty to protect us from granting virtually unlimited power to the executive branch. My senators are fillibustering.

Are yours? We don’t have a lot of time left and apparently we only need eleven more Senators. Why not give yours a call today? [Tags: politics alito fillibuster]

4 Comments »

Islamicate blogs a review of Reza Aslan’s No God but God about the history and future of Islam. The review makes me want to read the book… [Tags: islam islamicate reza+aslan reviews books]

4 Comments »

SPOILER ALERT: If you have not read the 6th Harry Potter, and have had cotton swabs in your ears for the past six months, read no further!

Our daughter, Leah, recommends DumbledoreIsNotDead.com. It has shaken her confidence in the deadness of the guy. (I am refraining from issuing my official I Told You So until the final book comes out.) [Tags: harry potter fan sites dumbledore spoilers]

1 Comment »

The “Bush Step Down” demonstrations an hour before the State of the Union are appealing to me. unfortunately, I’m going to be on a train… [Tags: george bush politics]

1 Comment »

Here’s the talk David Isenberg gave at O’Reill eTel. It is, rather amazingly, a disquisition about freedom to connect, done in the style of dr. Seuss.’ [Tags: david+isenberg f2c freedom+to-connecf]

Be the first to comment »

We’re seeing off our daughter who is going to study in Florence (yes, Italy, not Florence, NJ, although I’m sure the latter is totally lovely and rich in Renaissance art) for a semester. So the four of us, aged 15 to 55, are going to spend a couple of days in NYC, since the plane departs from JFK. We’re staying near Times Square. Here’s the challenge:

A couple of us are Shabbos-keeping Jews and thus can’t go in motorized vehicles or pay money from Friday evening through Saturday at around 7pm. (There’s a great worldwide database of kosher restaurants at Shamash.org, by the way.)

But wait, there’s more: One of us is on crutches after knee surgery and another of us is having a back problem and can’t walk for much more than hour without having to do some serious sitting. The back-problem person is also generally whiny, is never satisfied, and will probably spend most of the day looking for good wifi signals.

We already have tickets for the Museum of Modern Art on Saturday.

Other suggestions? [Tags: nyc]

13 Comments »

All I know about Krugle.com is that it’s launching at Demo, it has something to do with “vertical search” and code, and it’s had the incredibly bad judgment to hire RB to blog for it. Also, my friend Steve Larsen seems to be involved. (These are all actually very good signs.) [Tags: rageboy steve larsen krugle]

6 Comments »

Steve is in Davos and describes describes well an experience I often have at conferences: Wandering alone, having failed to hook into anyone’s dinner plans. But his has a little twist at the end. [Tags: steve johnson davos conferences]

2 Comments »

Hoder, the Iranian blogger is in Israel. He writes:

I’m going to Israel as a citizen journalist and a peace activist.

As a citizen journalist, I’m going to show my 20,000 daily Iranian readers what Israel really looks like and how people live there. The Islamic Republic has long portrayed Israel as an evil state, with a consensual political agenda of killing every single man and woman who prays to Allah, including Iranians.

I’m going to challenge that image.

5 Comments »

Mark Liberman doesn’t like the word “blawg.” Denise Howell, who coined it, responds charmingly, and even manages to work in her phrase “doorknob spam.”

Meanwhile, in the Arrested Development we watched last night, there was a reference to Bob Loblaw’s law blog. (Bob Loblaw is just such a good name, but only if you say it aloud.) [Tags: blawg deniseHowell arrestedDevelopment bobLoblaw markLiberman law blogs language doorknob spam]

4 Comments »

Ok, so that’s not quite the appropriate take-away from the new Pew Internet & American Life study. Its subtitle is more accurate:

The internet and email aid users inmaintaining their social networks and provide pathways to help when people face big decisions

The first nine pages summarize the findings.

Here’s an almost-randomly chosen snippet to give you a taste of its flavor:

Robert Putnam argued in 2000 that people are seeing friends and relatives much less than they were in the mid-1960s. For example, family picnics decreased by 60% between 1975 and 1999, and card playing went down from an average of 16 times per year in 1981, to 8 times per year in 1999.

Yet evidence from the Social Ties survey show that the situation is not so dire. For one thing, we did not ask about picnics; we asked directly about social relations. This leads to a focus on social networks, whomever they include and wherever they are located. For example, friends and relatives are now spatially dispersed rather than concentrated in neighborhoods. The difficulty of traveling to get together may explain why picnics have declined as a way for friends and relatives to meet. Yet other ways of interacting have flourished, on- and offline.

Americans have an average of more than 200 relationships with friends, relatives, and acquaintances…

Lee Rainie of Pew says, “We worked with some terrific network sociologists to get this right and try to place it in the larger context of social change over the past generation.” Looks good. It’s even well-written, a real plus for a research report (but not a surprise for a Pew Internet report). [Tags: internet pew leeRainie]

1 Comment »

Yes, I had a scary moment last night. The case for the linux computer my nephew Greg and I put together a few weeks ago – I’m using the computer initially for writing my book – came with a little board with eight LEDs that dance in joy when the computer starts. Those wires shorted, melting their insulation and making me realize I don’t yet have a backup routine for the computer.

After disconnecting the melted wires and cracking a window in my home office, all is well.

1 Comment »

The Berkman Center, along with the Oxford Internet Institute, Consumer Reports Webwatch, and a bunch of corporate sponsors, have launched StopBadware.org, an attempt to organize volunteers to create a database of purveyors of malware.

Sounds good! And it’s got a great set of people/organizations behind it. [Tags: adware malware berkman]

(Disclosure, I’m on the board of advisors of SiteAdvisor, a company using a different technique to compile a similar database. The initiatives seem to me to be complementary.)

Be the first to comment »

“…purity is an idea for a yogi or monk…
Well, I have dirty hands.
Right up to the elbows,
I’ve plunged them in filth and blood”
JP Sartre*

Google is going to censor results for Chinese users.

Andrew McLaughlin, Google’s Senior Policy Counsel, puts the problem well: “While removing search results is inconsistent with Google’s mission, providing no information (or a heavily degraded user experience that amounts to no information) is more inconsistent with our mission.”

It’s a tough world. Most of what we do is morally mixed. The consequences aren’t unambiguously good and our intentions are never pure. Google has apparently gone through some genuine soul-searching. I know Andrew and have the highest respect for him; if you had the privilege of spending time with him, you would too.

So, I find myself torn. Doing the work of a totalitarian state is bad. Of course. But Google plans on noting on results pages when results have been censored; alerting Chinese users to the fact of censorship could have a positive political effect. Apparently Google also plans on having a link to the US-hosted version. And they won’t host user data on servers under Chinese jurisdiction so they won’t have to turn users over to the Chinese police.

That helps. But is it enough?

If forced to choose — as Google has been — I’d probably do what Google is doing. It sucks, it stinks, but how would an information embargo help? It wouldn’t apply pressure on the Chinese government. Chinese citizens would not be any more likely to rise up against the government because they don’t have access to Google. Staying out of China would not lead to a more free China.

I’m not sure I’m right. Maybe my assessment of the likely consequences is wrong. And the high ground has its appeal, not least of which is that it keeps my hands clean. But the Chinese government is a big gob of repression plopped onto the middle kingdom, spattering our clean white robes.

At least it shows once and for all that Google’s motto is just silly in a world as complex as this one.

Some other opinions:

Rebecca MacKinnon:

At the end of the day, this compromise puts Google a little lower on the evil scale than many other internet companies in China. But is this compromise something Google should be proud of? No. They have put a foot further into the mud. Now let’s see whether they get sucked in deeper or whether they end up holding their ground.

Danny Sullivan at Search Engine Watch:

Oh, the irony. Less than a week after we hear that Google is ready to fight the US government in part to defend its users, now comes news that Google will cave into the Chinese government’s demands for its new Google China web site. However, the issues aren’t directly comparable. Moreover, while I’m no fan of Chinese censorship, I like some of the way Google is reacting to the demands. Come along, and we’ll explore the entire censorship situation in China, the US and some other places you rarely hear discussed, like France and Germany.

Ethan Zuckerman:

The devil’s in the details. And the attention taken to detail tells me that Google has thought long and hard about what they were doing and come up with a compromise. It’s a compromise that doesn’t make me happy, that probably doesn’t make most of the people who work for Google very happy, but which has been carefully thought through. And that, I think, gives some reason for optimism.

[Tags: google china]

22 Comments »

Ed Felten writes about his attempt to find out about the VEIL content protect technology specified in the Sensenbrenner/Conyers bill that would mandate that electronic devices plug the “analog hole.” (The analog hole is the fact that analog playback can be converted into digits. E.g., point a digital camcorder at a movie screen. Or, play a DRM’ed mp3 on your computer and use digital recording software to intercept the analog signal on its way to your speakers. More here , here and here.)

Ed contacted that company that sells VEIL and asked for a copy of the specification. He was told that that was no problem so long as he ponied up $10,000 and agreed not to talk about the spec. And that was only for the decoder side of the tech. The encoder stuff is too secret for anyone to see at any price.

So, Congress may pass a law that mandates a privately-owned technical spec that citizens aren’t allowed to see and expert citizens aren’t allowed to evaluate. Ed wonders whether even Congress has been allowed to see it. (And if they did, do we trust Congress to perform the required technical analysis?)

Says Ed: “We’re talking about television here, not national security.” [Tags: digitalRights analogHole]

1 Comment »

Want to get the latest updates from bloggers around the world but you just don’t have time to check an RSS feed? Global Voices is now willing to insert daily digests straight into your inbox. [Tags: globalVoices]

1 Comment »

Two paragraphs before the end of the AP story about the Canadian national elections, the reporter, Beth Duff-Brown, writes:

William Azaroff, 35, voted for the left-of-center New Democratic Party but conceded a Conservative government was likely to win.

”I think it’s a shame,” said the business manager from Vancouver, British Columbia. ”I think the last government was actually quite effective for Canadians. I think a Conservative government is just a backlash against certain corruption and the sense of entitlement.”

I’m sure that William Azaroff is a perfectly nice and thoughtful 35 year old and a considerate business manager who motivates his employees and contributes consistently to the bottom line. But with over 60% of the electorate turning out in this election, why are we hearing from him instead of my friend Molly in Toronto or the 14th customer at the Vancouver Pastries 2 Go shop?

Isn’t this simply a way for the reporter to get her opinions in?

Why isn’t there an industry guideline forbidding this common technique? [Tags: media]

7 Comments »

Since the Bush Administration will not release White House photos of Bush and Abramoff, even though the pitctures were taken with tax payer money, I figure it’s our patriotic duty to release our own.

(Hasn’t anyone already photoshopped a Brokeback parody photo of George and Jack? They have the hats for it.) [Tags: gerogeBush jackAbramoff]

8 Comments »

John Blyberg has put together a virtual card catalog that lets you build your own, share it with others, and create catalog card facsimiles complete with “handwritten” annotations. [Thanks to Ed Vielmetti for the link.]

O’Reilly has announced the “Rough Cuts” service that gives readers access to works-in-progress: If you buy a book before it’s been published and then watch it being developed. Pretty damn cool.

Yet another assault on time: As more and more events turn into processes, what the hell do we need the present before? [Tags: johnBlyberg libraries taxonomy tagging EverythingIsMiscellaneous oreilly publishing books time]

Be the first to comment »

A couple of weeks ago, Mary Hodder mentioned that she was coming to Boston and we talked about putting together a dinner. I offered to host it at our house, and it turned into a get-together on the “Save Our Internet” theme. All of which is to say that Dan Bricklin came with his podcasting gear and has posted a set of interviews he did there.

Yes, now we’re podcasting dinner. [Tags: danBricklin podcast]

4 Comments »

Larry Lessig has posted a video of a presentation on whether Google Book Search (AKA Google Print) is protected by Fair Use. His conclusion: Yup. But how he gets there is fascinating and informative. Why wouldn’t you want to hear one of the nation’s top law professors clearly addressing such a fundamental issue? [Tags: lessig google googlePrint law copyright digitalRights]

1 Comment »

Zephyr Teachout and Britt Blaser, both veterans of the Howard Dean Internet campaign, reflect on how to fix what’s going wrong at the well-intentioned Since Sliced Bread contest. The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) is sponsoring the contest, offering $100,000 to the person who comes up with the best idea for improving the lives of working women and men. 22,000 ideas were submitted which “a group of diverse experts” winnowed to 70, a process some felt was too top down.

This is a fascinating case in which a bottom-up process is supposed to squeeze out a single winner, the contest is intended to advance the social good, and the reward includes a hefty chunk of change. [Tags: seiu zephyrTeachout brittBlaser]

Be the first to comment »

Defective Yeti has a funny transcript of the invasion of Iraq as a text adventure. Here’s how it begins:

Oval OfficeYou are standing inside a White House, having just been elected to the presidency of the United States. You knew Scalia would pull through for you.

There is a large desk here, along with a few chairs and couches. The presidential seal is in the middle of the room and there is a full-length mirror upon the wall.

What do you want to do now?

> INVADE IRAQ
You are not able to do that, yet.

> LOOK MIRROR
Self-reflection is not your strong suit.

> PET SEAL
It’s not that kind of seal.

> EXAMINE CHAIRS
They are two several chairs arranged around the center of the room, along with two couches. Under one couch you find Clinton’s shoes.

> FILL SHOES
You are unable to fill Clinton’s shoes.

(Thanks to Deborah Elizabeth Finn for the link.) [Tags: iraq humor defectiveYeti]

3 Comments »

This is a message, verbatim, Jimmy “Wikipedia” Wales sent to a mailing list I’m on. (I asked his permission to run it, and turned some urls into hyperlinks.)

BTW, I wrote about the Wikipedia-Seigenthaler affair in my newsletter. [Tags: wikipedia jimmyWales media]

5 Comments »

I remain surprised that I can’t find a program that lets me do the most basic of research tasks: Take notes. on books…you know, the paper-based web sites we used to read.

Oh, sure, there are word processors and various outliners, some of which are terrific. But note-taking has some specific requirements. So, here’s my RFP for a program I’m calling Notetella for purposes of discussion. (”RFP” is short for “Easy for you to say.”)

It’s got a stand-alone client and a Web portion.

I know there are pieces of this around. There are some great outliners. There are Web-based systems such as Cluebacca and Clipmarks (which got a nice mention in the WSJ today), but they’re also not aimed exactly at my particular needs…and I think my needs in this case are fairly common among people reading books for research.

Sure wish I were a software developer. A really good one. With lots of free time. And an Hawaiian beach house. (Why not?)

5 Comments »

I know lots of people don’t trust Google, and the company certainly has its faults, but I still think it’s the biggest company around that’s on our side in the battle over the future of the Internet.

Two recent issues trying Google’s mettle:

1. Preston Gralla reports that Google has refused to pay special fees to BellSouth and Verizon as part of a tiered service approach that would let the carriers decide who and what type of content gets preference on the Internet.

2. Howard Mintz reports in the Mercury News that Google last year refused to comply with a Bush administration subpoena asking for all the Google searches from any one-week period. They’re apparently trying to catch guys who masturbate to pornographic images of children.

In both these cases, Google could be acting in a purely self-interested way. I actually believe it’s a mix of self-interest and principle. Either way, it’s good to read about a company with clout standing up for what turn out to be our interests as well.

[Tags: google digitalRights]

Mark Hall makes the interesting point that Google’s stand on the subpoena might become a competitive advantage that inspires others to adopt the same stand…engendering market forces that protect us against government intrusion. He points to newspapers as an example. But, as he says, we shouldn’t have to rely “on the power of market forces and profit incentives to secure our fundamental constitutional rights.”

6 Comments »

Jason Toal had a paper accepted for presentation at the IA Summit. It’s called “The Life of Tags,” (abstract) : “Our paper will pursue potential opportunities for adding a usable layer of rules to the process of tagging.” The sorts of rules are like those in cellular automata systems, such as the game of Life. The abstract puts aside using ontologies to disambiguate tags. Sounds interesting.

So, the first thing Jason did upon hearing his (their?) paper had been accepted was to set up a blog to work on it in public. I know doing this isn’t news, but it still gives me just a smidgeon of hope. What a difference from how research was done ten years ago!

By the way, at the blog I found a link to STEVE — Social Terminology Enhancement through Vernacular Engagement — a project developed by a group of museums to enable social filtering of their collections. Jason writes: “Steve is an attempt to democratize a collections catalogue, not by replacing the curators perspective, but by adding an additional layer of information provided by the public.” Cool. [Tags: jasonToal iaSummit ia taxonomy EverythingIsMiscellaneous museums cellularAutomata]

3 Comments »

Headline in the Brookline Tab:

Vatican Denies Church’s Appeal

No, the Pope has not stated that Catholicism is unappealing. Rather, a local church’s appeal not to be closed was denied.

While I like being told metadata such as what’s the maximum number of stars used in a rating system, I found this from the Boston Globe’s Calendar section to be odd:

Restaurants reviewed by the Globe’s regular critic, Alison Arnett, are rated on a scale of zero to four stars, four being the highest. [Emphasis added.]

Is there a single instance of a rating system using stars to indicate negatives? Just wondering…

And there’s this, which was sent to my sister without attribution:

Quarterhorse

*FYA= For Your Amusement.

6 Comments »

Rebecca has posted an email interview with me. The topic is blogging. [Tags: rebeccaBlood blogging]

3 Comments »

Yesterday, I saw Dan Bricklin demo his new project, wikiCalc. It’s a wiki spreadsheet. Like a spreadsheet, it does calculations on figures in a grid, and lets you enter formatted, cell-straddling text. Like a wiki, it lets anyone with permission make changes. It’s such a good idea that I thought we must already all be using it.

It’s in alpha, so it’s not yet a full-featured spreadsheet, but it’s getting there quickly. Because it’s AJAX-y, the cell editing is interactive. And it’s open source.

Great idea and looks like a cool implementation.

[Tags: wikicalc wikis danBricklin spreadsheets "web 2.0"]

1 Comment »

Bruce Schneier replies to Kevin Kelly’s warnings about anonymity.

I’m with Schneier on this one because of the practical consequences, in the real world, of limiting anonymity and increasing the ability to tie our online identities back to our real world ones. [Tags: anonymity bruceSchneier kevinKelly]

1 Comment »

Andrew Sullivan reviews two books and starts to piece together how “a noble and necessary decision to remove the Saddam Hussein regime result[ed] in such a chaotic occupation.” I find it a plausible explanation. No big surprises in the piece except that the sources are Paul Bremer and Bush pal Fred Barnes. [Tags: iraq georgeBush andrewSullivan politics paulBremer]

1 Comment »

You can get your Senators’ phone numbers here if you’re inclined to urge them to filibuster Alito.

I’ve been trying to call Kennedy and Kerry, and I’m happy to report that their lines are busy. [Tags: politics alito filibuster]

Be the first to comment »

[Note: I think I may be saying something tired, obvious, and oft said. So what else is new?]

Thinking about Dan Gillmor’s talk today it seemed to me that the journalistic conniption we’re going through is going to be resolved in part by giving up on the notion of coverage. (I asked Dan about this afterwards; he hopes I’m wrong.)

The notion that a newspaper can “cover” the day’s events has always been a myth. Just ask Ethan about “coverage” of Africa in even the best US newspapers. In the post-paper world, we’re not going to be able to even pretend we’re achieving coverage. And even if citizen reporters around the world provide more information about more events than were dreamt of in the MSM’s philosophy it’ll be clear that we’re each reading a tiny slice based on personal and social interests. The concept of “coverage” doesn’t make sense in the post-paper world.

That’s scary, the way losing values and assumptions in serious transitions is scary. But I think it’s inevitable. (And that’s almost always an indication that I’m wrong.) [Tags: media journalism]

5 Comments »