<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How I saved the Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2006/06/29/how-i-saved-the-internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2006/06/29/how-i-saved-the-internet/</link>
	<description>Let's just see what happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 09:24:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Robertson</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2006/06/29/how-i-saved-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-22732</link>
		<dc:creator>James Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2006/06/29/how-i-saved-the-internet/#comment-22732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With any luck, he&#039;ll fail.  I&#039;ve outlined my opposition to net neutrality a number of times on my blog, but to summarize:

1) If we get neutrality regulations, it will make the (US based) net a &quot;public utility&quot;

2) Public utilities used for public communications get regulated in the US, period.  Think TV and Radio; think &quot;for the children&quot; rules

3) If you think you&#039;ll get neutrality and no content restrictions, I suspect you also think there&#039;s a pony under every large pile of manure.

Seriously - legislated neutrality could be very dangerous.  We&#039;ve had a private, limited regulation net for a long time now, and the kinds of actions all the neutrality advocates fear have not happened.  It&#039;s not broke; the fix will be a very bad thing.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With any luck, he&#8217;ll fail.  I&#8217;ve outlined my opposition to net neutrality a number of times on my blog, but to summarize:</p>
<p>1) If we get neutrality regulations, it will make the (US based) net a &#8220;public utility&#8221;</p>
<p>2) Public utilities used for public communications get regulated in the US, period.  Think TV and Radio; think &#8220;for the children&#8221; rules</p>
<p>3) If you think you&#8217;ll get neutrality and no content restrictions, I suspect you also think there&#8217;s a pony under every large pile of manure.</p>
<p>Seriously &#8211; legislated neutrality could be very dangerous.  We&#8217;ve had a private, limited regulation net for a long time now, and the kinds of actions all the neutrality advocates fear have not happened.  It&#8217;s not broke; the fix will be a very bad thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.320 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-06-16 22:22:58 -->