Comments on: Blogger Codes of Conduct

By: Flower Names

Flower Names — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 03:42:23 +0000

I’ll be adding a link from my site to yours. This is quality stuff. Keep it coming!

By: RaiulBaztepo

RaiulBaztepo — Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:08:19 +0000

Hello!
Very Interesting post! Thank you for such interesting resource!
PS: Sorry for my bad english, I’v just started to learn this language ;)
See you!
Your, Raiul Baztepo

By: Chef

Chef — Thu, 19 Mar 2009 05:38:01 +0000

I have your site bookmarked and your feed link saved. I should be good to go now.

By: Ankara Bilgisayar

Ankara Bilgisayar — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:30:20 +0000

Thank you for the nice article!

By: pozycjonowanie i optymalizacja

pozycjonowanie i optymalizacja — Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:41:20 +0000

thank you.

By: projekty domow

projekty domow — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 06:56:38 +0000

thank you.

By: Katalog Stron

Katalog Stron — Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:22:33 +0000

Hi
Some may accept on topic advertising, some don’t, there’s no intrinsic violation of anyone’s rights.

By: Fredric Alan Maxwell

Fredric Alan Maxwell — Mon, 09 Apr 2007 12:51:16 +0000

You’re perfectly on target, Dave. After my unauthorized Steve Ballmer biography was published, I received the most vile and nonsensical comments from folks who’d rather not reveal their names. Amazon took down at least a half-dozen libelous reviews. Then when I let a site run three paragraphs of my piece about the adopted-at-birth Steve Jobs biological father, you’d think I’d created AIDS. It wouldn’t surprise me if Microsoftians were behind the Ballmer-related stuff. What better way to attempt to discredit an author than have your public relations propogandists hide behind screen names and whip up a negative campaign, clouding an issue with blog smog. Only when bloggers are held to a higher standard will they legitimize themselves. More power to ya, Dave, and the BlogHers as well.

By: Crosbie Fitch

Crosbie Fitch — Sat, 07 Apr 2007 10:25:41 +0000

Don’t worry, I knew that my reference to Ertreh’s ideogrammaticisms might cause you a minor decision crisis… ;-)

I still don’t know how you expect your guidelines to have any affect upon those who would contravene and a priori ignore them.

I can only assume your intention is perversely, to produce some effect in your commenters who would never have infringed the guidelines anyway.

Perhaps you consider many of your potential commenters (unlike me) will be impressed and reassured by their bloggers’ sentimental demonstration?

“Oh, he’s against nasty commenters is he? Excellent. That means it’s safe for me to comment here in the full knowledge that no-one will respond with a bullying comment, or abuse or stalk me, well, at least not on this blog.”

It’s like having a sign at a bank entrance that says “Bank robbers are prohibited from entry” – as if you’re otherwise encouraging them. “Oh, we bank at Joho’s. It’s safe to bank there because they prohibit bank robbers”.

At least make your ‘guidelines’ a javascript link to a pop-up box.

You will let me know if you feel that I’m bullying you, won’t you? ;-)

By: David Weinberger

David Weinberger — Fri, 06 Apr 2007 22:03:52 +0000

Darn, Crosbie! I wanted to let you have the last word, but you refer to what apparently was a spam-comment that I removed. So I just wanted to clarify that…