<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: XXClone: Software that works</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2007/04/26/xxclone-software-that-works/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2007/04/26/xxclone-software-that-works/</link>
	<description>Let's just see what happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 09:24:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Wray</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2007/04/26/xxclone-software-that-works/comment-page-1/#comment-74405</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Wray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 20:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leahweinberger.com/johotheblog_wp/?p=3670#comment-74405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have read quite a few &quot;it doesn&#039;t work&quot; reports, but it worked first time for me. I used it to upgrade my C drive from 80 to 160 GB (I took the 160GB out of a scrap video recorder).

The only downside was the 6GB per hour transfer rate, 10 hours for a 75% full 80 GB drive. This did give me time to read the help file, so maybe some people fail to run the &quot;cool tools&quot; to make it bootable.

The great advantage it has over the other cloner I tried - Macrium Reflect - is that it doesn&#039;t convert the target drive into an exact clone (same size, etc). I had to resort to low level formatting to undo the results of using Reflect.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read quite a few &#8220;it doesn&#8217;t work&#8221; reports, but it worked first time for me. I used it to upgrade my C drive from 80 to 160 GB (I took the 160GB out of a scrap video recorder).</p>
<p>The only downside was the 6GB per hour transfer rate, 10 hours for a 75% full 80 GB drive. This did give me time to read the help file, so maybe some people fail to run the &#8220;cool tools&#8221; to make it bootable.</p>
<p>The great advantage it has over the other cloner I tried &#8211; Macrium Reflect &#8211; is that it doesn&#8217;t convert the target drive into an exact clone (same size, etc). I had to resort to low level formatting to undo the results of using Reflect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Bond</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2007/04/26/xxclone-software-that-works/comment-page-1/#comment-13485</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Bond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leahweinberger.com/johotheblog_wp/?p=3670#comment-13485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I&#039;ve had to do this, I&#039;ve had the best success with a Knoppix CD, the DDRescue command and Qparted. All free. Doing this over a USB connection is horribly slow so the trick is to put both drives into a desktop PC.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I&#8217;ve had to do this, I&#8217;ve had the best success with a Knoppix CD, the DDRescue command and Qparted. All free. Doing this over a USB connection is horribly slow so the trick is to put both drives into a desktop PC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.481 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-06-16 21:23:01 -->