Comments on: What tagging loses http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/03/17/what-tagging-loses/ Let's just see what happens Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:55:43 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: tournoi poker casino http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/03/17/what-tagging-loses/comment-page-1/#comment-32581 tournoi poker casino Mon, 02 Jun 2008 14:05:37 +0000 http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/03/17/what-tagging-loses/#comment-32581 <strong>poker regeln blind...</strong> ... poker regeln blind…

…

]]> By: davidw http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/03/17/what-tagging-loses/comment-page-1/#comment-29699 davidw Tue, 18 Mar 2008 19:38:26 +0000 http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/03/17/what-tagging-loses/#comment-29699 fp, I agree fully. "Discussion" is a better word. fp, I agree fully. “Discussion” is a better word.

]]> By: plethaurus / To tag or not to tag? http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/03/17/what-tagging-loses/comment-page-1/#comment-29695 plethaurus / To tag or not to tag? Tue, 18 Mar 2008 06:19:17 +0000 http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/03/17/what-tagging-loses/#comment-29695 [...] o’ the hat to David Weinberger for the Mann link. And apologies to Will.] Tags: cataloguing, [...] [...] o’ the hat to David Weinberger for the Mann link. And apologies to Will.] Tags: cataloguing, [...]

]]> By: fp http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/03/17/what-tagging-loses/comment-page-1/#comment-29687 fp Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:51:45 +0000 http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/03/17/what-tagging-loses/#comment-29687 "Productive debate?" pfeh. Debate is adversarial. Debate is zero sum. Debate is bounded by victory and defeat, and limited by terms and conditions. What I'd hope for is a productive discussion, a discussion that would doubtless include some passionate arguments. (I suspect that you wouldn't argue with me about this.) “Productive debate?” pfeh. Debate is adversarial. Debate is zero sum. Debate is bounded by victory and defeat, and limited by terms and conditions. What I’d hope for is a productive discussion, a discussion that would doubtless include some passionate arguments.

(I suspect that you wouldn’t argue with me about this.)

]]>