<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Long form arguments are over-rated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/06/23/long-form-arguments-are-over-rated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/06/23/long-form-arguments-are-over-rated/</link>
	<description>Let's just see what happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:55:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yule Heibel</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/06/23/long-form-arguments-are-over-rated/comment-page-1/#comment-34197</link>
		<dc:creator>Yule Heibel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 04:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/06/23/long-form-arguments-are-over-rated/#comment-34197</guid>
		<description>As an ex-academic who was used to long (and even leisurely), above all uninterrupted disquisitions on philosophy &amp; art &amp; theory, but who, in becoming a mother, had to learn to that if she ever wanted to get *anything* done again (like, not eat cereal for dinner and instead enjoy a cooked meal -- we&#039;re talking basic stuff here!), she had better learn to multi-task, I found myself deeply resenting Carr&#039;s article.  (Like, puerilely resenting, as in thinking, &quot;I bet HE has a *wife* at home!&quot;...)

Instead of worrying that the internet/ google is making us stupid, I prefer to think of the internet as our brand new baby.  And, yep, it&#039;s interrupting and distracting us (and making us &quot;stupid&quot; by Father Carr&#039;s standards), but guess what?  We are learning so much, especially when we pay attention to how we&#039;re growing in tandem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an ex-academic who was used to long (and even leisurely), above all uninterrupted disquisitions on philosophy &amp; art &amp; theory, but who, in becoming a mother, had to learn to that if she ever wanted to get *anything* done again (like, not eat cereal for dinner and instead enjoy a cooked meal &#8212; we&#8217;re talking basic stuff here!), she had better learn to multi-task, I found myself deeply resenting Carr&#8217;s article.  (Like, puerilely resenting, as in thinking, &#8220;I bet HE has a *wife* at home!&#8221;&#8230;)</p>
<p>Instead of worrying that the internet/ google is making us stupid, I prefer to think of the internet as our brand new baby.  And, yep, it&#8217;s interrupting and distracting us (and making us &#8220;stupid&#8221; by Father Carr&#8217;s standards), but guess what?  We are learning so much, especially when we pay attention to how we&#8217;re growing in tandem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/06/23/long-form-arguments-are-over-rated/comment-page-1/#comment-34130</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/06/23/long-form-arguments-are-over-rated/#comment-34130</guid>
		<description>It is funny that Carr doesn&#039;t shed a single drop of irony in complaining about how people don&#039;t read long articles... in a long article in The Atlantic.

I&#039;ve read his piece - both online and (recently, while waiting for 2 hrs at the airport) in the paper version - and while it is a nice piece the problem is that the counter argument, or counter examples, seem to be just as possible and probable.

On balance, I think being able to look things up is a net positive. And while Google is the current distraction, I suspect that human beings have *always* had distractions. There is a certain evolutionary benefit to being able to drop what you&#039;re doing when something more interesting (or dangerous!) pops up, isn&#039;t there?

...r</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is funny that Carr doesn&#8217;t shed a single drop of irony in complaining about how people don&#8217;t read long articles&#8230; in a long article in The Atlantic.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read his piece &#8211; both online and (recently, while waiting for 2 hrs at the airport) in the paper version &#8211; and while it is a nice piece the problem is that the counter argument, or counter examples, seem to be just as possible and probable.</p>
<p>On balance, I think being able to look things up is a net positive. And while Google is the current distraction, I suspect that human beings have *always* had distractions. There is a certain evolutionary benefit to being able to drop what you&#8217;re doing when something more interesting (or dangerous!) pops up, isn&#8217;t there?</p>
<p>&#8230;r</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold Jarche</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/06/23/long-form-arguments-are-over-rated/comment-page-1/#comment-34123</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold Jarche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/06/23/long-form-arguments-are-over-rated/#comment-34123</guid>
		<description>Reminds me of Diamond&#039;s &quot;Guns, Germs &amp; Steel&quot;, a Pulitzer prize winner that went &quot;off the rails&quot; after the initial few chapters, IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reminds me of Diamond&#8217;s &#8220;Guns, Germs &amp; Steel&#8221;, a Pulitzer prize winner that went &#8220;off the rails&#8221; after the initial few chapters, IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/06/23/long-form-arguments-are-over-rated/comment-page-1/#comment-34115</link>
		<dc:creator>David Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/06/23/long-form-arguments-are-over-rated/#comment-34115</guid>
		<description>Very much agree with this point. Nietzsche turned me on to it originally...

Comes from the &#039;people are rational&#039; fallacy/belief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very much agree with this point. Nietzsche turned me on to it originally&#8230;</p>
<p>Comes from the &#8216;people are rational&#8217; fallacy/belief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
