<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Turning to the bloggers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/07/21/turning-to-the-bloggers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/07/21/turning-to-the-bloggers/</link>
	<description>Let's just see what happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:55:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/07/21/turning-to-the-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-36988</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/?p=6972#comment-36988</guid>
		<description>americans always think that they come first and then a loooong time nothing and thern maybe somewhere canada.  news flash: the world is a very big place and most of whats going on is concerning us all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>americans always think that they come first and then a loooong time nothing and thern maybe somewhere canada.  news flash: the world is a very big place and most of whats going on is concerning us all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EthanZ</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/07/21/turning-to-the-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-36954</link>
		<dc:creator>EthanZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/?p=6972#comment-36954</guid>
		<description>David, I offered some thoughts on the study here: http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2008/07/21/the-changing-newsroom-good-bad-and-ugly/

In summary - it&#039;s a fascinating study and a real mixed bag for those of us fascinated by journalism in a digital age. There&#039;s great evidence that bloggers versus journalists is, truly, over... and really bad news for fans of international news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, I offered some thoughts on the study here: <a href="http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2008/07/21/the-changing-newsroom-good-bad-and-ugly/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/.....-and-ugly/</a></p>
<p>In summary &#8211; it&#8217;s a fascinating study and a real mixed bag for those of us fascinated by journalism in a digital age. There&#8217;s great evidence that bloggers versus journalists is, truly, over&#8230; and really bad news for fans of international news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Federman</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/07/21/turning-to-the-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-36917</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Federman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/?p=6972#comment-36917</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m struck by the part of the article that says, &quot;&lt;em&gt;most papers report that their reporters’ blog posts are not edited before going online. A majority of the editors who took part in the study said they worry about a loss of institutional memory and journalistic standards, as experienced people leave the business and a younger crew of reporters publishes more news quickly online. But almost half the editors said they were more excited than fearful about the possibilities of the Internet.&lt;/em&gt;&quot;

It seems to me that, together with an increased focus on what is happening within their direct, local frame of experience, the decrease in institutional memory and experience, and the reduction in so-called journalistic standards, conventional newspapers are adopting what they previously identified as the problematics of the bloggers! The Daily Me, indeed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m struck by the part of the article that says, &#8220;<em>most papers report that their reporters’ blog posts are not edited before going online. A majority of the editors who took part in the study said they worry about a loss of institutional memory and journalistic standards, as experienced people leave the business and a younger crew of reporters publishes more news quickly online. But almost half the editors said they were more excited than fearful about the possibilities of the Internet.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>It seems to me that, together with an increased focus on what is happening within their direct, local frame of experience, the decrease in institutional memory and experience, and the reduction in so-called journalistic standards, conventional newspapers are adopting what they previously identified as the problematics of the bloggers! The Daily Me, indeed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
