<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why McCain should lose, in a single sentence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/09/20/why-mccain-should-lose-in-a-single-sentence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/09/20/why-mccain-should-lose-in-a-single-sentence/</link>
	<description>Let's just see what happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:55:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Виктор Евсеев</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/09/20/why-mccain-should-lose-in-a-single-sentence/comment-page-1/#comment-47324</link>
		<dc:creator>Виктор Евсеев</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 02:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/09/20/why-mccain-should-lose-in-a-single-sentence/#comment-47324</guid>
		<description>Круто! Со смартфона немного тяжело читается, но оно того стоит!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Круто! Со смартфона немного тяжело читается, но оно того стоит!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ingiltere dil okulu</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/09/20/why-mccain-should-lose-in-a-single-sentence/comment-page-1/#comment-38485</link>
		<dc:creator>ingiltere dil okulu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/09/20/why-mccain-should-lose-in-a-single-sentence/#comment-38485</guid>
		<description>Good web site, thanks.. Happy Ramadan for everyone..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good web site, thanks.. Happy Ramadan for everyone..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johne</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/09/20/why-mccain-should-lose-in-a-single-sentence/comment-page-1/#comment-38348</link>
		<dc:creator>johne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/09/20/why-mccain-should-lose-in-a-single-sentence/#comment-38348</guid>
		<description>&quot;.... The Community Reinvestment Act was passed in 1977. Are we supposed to believe that CRA was working smoothly throughout the Carter, Reagan, Bush I, and Clinton years and then only under Bush II did overzealous anti-”redlining” enforcement come into play, perhaps a result of Dubya’s legendarily close relationship with ACORN? Or maybe overzealous enforcement back in the late 1970s is somehow responsible for a real estate blowout that only materialized 30 years later? It doesn’t even come close to making sense.
 
&quot;Beyond that, the mere existence of “subprime” loans — i.e., mortgages given to less-creditworthy individuals at higher interest rates — isn’t the problem here. The problems have to do with what was done with the loans after they were packaged, sold and used to make leveraged plays.&quot;

http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2008/09/blame_the_cra.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;. The Community Reinvestment Act was passed in 1977. Are we supposed to believe that CRA was working smoothly throughout the Carter, Reagan, Bush I, and Clinton years and then only under Bush II did overzealous anti-”redlining” enforcement come into play, perhaps a result of Dubya’s legendarily close relationship with ACORN? Or maybe overzealous enforcement back in the late 1970s is somehow responsible for a real estate blowout that only materialized 30 years later? It doesn’t even come close to making sense.</p>
<p>&#8220;Beyond that, the mere existence of “subprime” loans — i.e., mortgages given to less-creditworthy individuals at higher interest rates — isn’t the problem here. The problems have to do with what was done with the loans after they were packaged, sold and used to make leveraged plays.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2008/09/blame_the_cra.php" rel="nofollow">http://yglesias.thinkprogress......he_cra.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidw</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/09/20/why-mccain-should-lose-in-a-single-sentence/comment-page-1/#comment-38308</link>
		<dc:creator>davidw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 12:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/09/20/why-mccain-should-lose-in-a-single-sentence/#comment-38308</guid>
		<description>Yes, ChiliMac, competition is good. (Of course, it&#039;s not good  in every area, because nothing is. There&#039;s no single solution to all problems.) But McCain is contrasting competition with deregulation, and pointing to the success of the banking industry. Haven&#039;t we learned that even where competition is the right approach, it can need regulation to keep it from (a) having results that don&#039;t serve social needs and/or (b) becoming non-competitive? Or do you think competition is an end in itself?

I continue to think that his single quotation from McCain expresses what&#039;s fundamentally wrong with his approach, while inadvertently giving evidence that that approach is fundamentally wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, ChiliMac, competition is good. (Of course, it&#8217;s not good  in every area, because nothing is. There&#8217;s no single solution to all problems.) But McCain is contrasting competition with deregulation, and pointing to the success of the banking industry. Haven&#8217;t we learned that even where competition is the right approach, it can need regulation to keep it from (a) having results that don&#8217;t serve social needs and/or (b) becoming non-competitive? Or do you think competition is an end in itself?</p>
<p>I continue to think that his single quotation from McCain expresses what&#8217;s fundamentally wrong with his approach, while inadvertently giving evidence that that approach is fundamentally wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Weinberger (yes, I am related)</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/09/20/why-mccain-should-lose-in-a-single-sentence/comment-page-1/#comment-38298</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Weinberger (yes, I am related)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 02:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/09/20/why-mccain-should-lose-in-a-single-sentence/#comment-38298</guid>
		<description>Competition in health insurance has not meant more choices for people.  Most decisions about health insurance are not made by the individuals who have the insurance in any case, they are made by the company they work for.  Many of the plans are quite similar in their coverage and in the fees they pay doctors and virtually all pay less than Medicare.  Competition has resulted in more multi-million dollar salaries to health insurance company executives (some make $20 million or more) and a lot of money to the rest of the executives.  See also my earlier response also.

In banking, I have not noted much in the way of differences in my local banks, many of which have been taken over by others.  I think we are on the fourth, or maybe fifth, iteration in 20 years in our personal account as it has changed hands to ever bigger corporations.  My business account bank was taken over and I lost my interest bearing checking account-so much for the benefits of competition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Competition in health insurance has not meant more choices for people.  Most decisions about health insurance are not made by the individuals who have the insurance in any case, they are made by the company they work for.  Many of the plans are quite similar in their coverage and in the fees they pay doctors and virtually all pay less than Medicare.  Competition has resulted in more multi-million dollar salaries to health insurance company executives (some make $20 million or more) and a lot of money to the rest of the executives.  See also my earlier response also.</p>
<p>In banking, I have not noted much in the way of differences in my local banks, many of which have been taken over by others.  I think we are on the fourth, or maybe fifth, iteration in 20 years in our personal account as it has changed hands to ever bigger corporations.  My business account bank was taken over and I lost my interest bearing checking account-so much for the benefits of competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChiliMac</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/09/20/why-mccain-should-lose-in-a-single-sentence/comment-page-1/#comment-38297</link>
		<dc:creator>ChiliMac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 22:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/09/20/why-mccain-should-lose-in-a-single-sentence/#comment-38297</guid>
		<description>David W, If you were paying attention to what Sen. McCain was saying you would know he was talking about competition. Opening up the banking industry to greater competition isn&#039;t the cause of the problem we are in now. Competition in banking has made it so we have more choice with more reasonable pricing. Competition is good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David W, If you were paying attention to what Sen. McCain was saying you would know he was talking about competition. Opening up the banking industry to greater competition isn&#8217;t the cause of the problem we are in now. Competition in banking has made it so we have more choice with more reasonable pricing. Competition is good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Admin&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Not Getting It</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/09/20/why-mccain-should-lose-in-a-single-sentence/comment-page-1/#comment-38290</link>
		<dc:creator>Admin&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Not Getting It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 16:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/09/20/why-mccain-should-lose-in-a-single-sentence/#comment-38290</guid>
		<description>[...] Quote via Joho. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Quote via Joho. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidw</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/09/20/why-mccain-should-lose-in-a-single-sentence/comment-page-1/#comment-38286</link>
		<dc:creator>davidw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 13:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/09/20/why-mccain-should-lose-in-a-single-sentence/#comment-38286</guid>
		<description>The &quot;soundbyte&quot; -- actually, a quote from an article he wrote -- wouldn&#039;t matter except that it succinctly summarizes what&#039;s wrong with McCain&#039;s overall approach to government: Deregulate because you think unregulated markets bring about the best results. Well, if there were any question about that approach, they&#039;re settled now. And even McCain apparently agrees since he&#039;s rapidly switched his position on the topic.

So, yes, ChiliMac, some quotes are worth excerpting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;soundbyte&#8221; &#8212; actually, a quote from an article he wrote &#8212; wouldn&#8217;t matter except that it succinctly summarizes what&#8217;s wrong with McCain&#8217;s overall approach to government: Deregulate because you think unregulated markets bring about the best results. Well, if there were any question about that approach, they&#8217;re settled now. And even McCain apparently agrees since he&#8217;s rapidly switched his position on the topic.</p>
<p>So, yes, ChiliMac, some quotes are worth excerpting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katrineholm Uncensored</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/09/20/why-mccain-should-lose-in-a-single-sentence/comment-page-1/#comment-38279</link>
		<dc:creator>Katrineholm Uncensored</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/09/20/why-mccain-should-lose-in-a-single-sentence/#comment-38279</guid>
		<description>Who cares?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChiliMac</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/09/20/why-mccain-should-lose-in-a-single-sentence/comment-page-1/#comment-38277</link>
		<dc:creator>ChiliMac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 04:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/09/20/why-mccain-should-lose-in-a-single-sentence/#comment-38277</guid>
		<description>I really think it&#039;s funny when people judge a candidate off of one sound bite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really think it&#8217;s funny when people judge a candidate off of one sound bite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
