Of course, this is a pre-Diebold breakdown of the voting preferences.
Well you can see that the presenter raises his hand as a McCain voter, so with weighting to his Fox News *power* plus the old bloke in the corner I guess that equates to 50%…
That is fantastic.
Fair and Balanced? The reporter is unbalanced in the head!
That is great!! Just the kind of clear journalism you can build a news network around.
Well, when you combine that with McCain / Palin’s interview with Couric about gotcha journalism where McCain implied that Couric’s interview of Palin fit in that category, you can see how Fox could also come up with something totally different than what is right in front of your eyes.
So how do you contradict someone who is saying something that is so totally the opposite of what has just been viewed?