<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Doc Searls &#8211; Washington Post photographer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2009/01/05/doc-searls-washington-post-photographer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2009/01/05/doc-searls-washington-post-photographer/</link>
	<description>Let's just see what happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:55:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: yvette</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2009/01/05/doc-searls-washington-post-photographer/comment-page-1/#comment-40659</link>
		<dc:creator>yvette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2009/01/05/doc-searls-washington-post-photographer/#comment-40659</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe the Washington Post made such a bad editorial decision in choosing that photo. Two basic &quot;rules&quot; in choosing a photo is naming everyone in the caption and not choosing a photo that doesn&#039;t prominently depict the person of interest. This photo clearly violated both. Also, although Dean Kagan was in the front, the camera&#039;s focus was on JZ. As there were a ton of other great solo photos of Dean Kagan taken by Doc, it mystifies me... or rather, doesn&#039;t make sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe the Washington Post made such a bad editorial decision in choosing that photo. Two basic &#8220;rules&#8221; in choosing a photo is naming everyone in the caption and not choosing a photo that doesn&#8217;t prominently depict the person of interest. This photo clearly violated both. Also, although Dean Kagan was in the front, the camera&#8217;s focus was on JZ. As there were a ton of other great solo photos of Dean Kagan taken by Doc, it mystifies me&#8230; or rather, doesn&#8217;t make sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
