logo

Let’s just see what happens

Mobile Version

About me

Newsletter

Videos

Speaker

Hard to Read? Choose a style: Style 1 Style 2 Style 3 Default Toggle Sidebars

Department of Justice on a weakness of auctions. Susan Crawford comments.

Posted on January 5th, 2010

The Department of Justice has filed comments on the FCC’s broadband plans. Susan Crawford, ex of the White House, blogs her reaction. For me, the most interesting of Susan’s comments is:

Re-allocation of spectrum makes sense. But the “foreclosure value” to market-powerful incumbents of buying that spectrum – and keeping their competitors from buying it – may exceed its market value. So DOJ very gently (with lots of caveats) suggests that the highest value use for new spectrum may actually be to make it available for license by new rivals.

This refers to this in the DoJ comments:

The goal in assigning licenses to any such new spectrum designated for commercial services should be to ensure that it generates the greatest ultimate benefits to the consumers of those services. When market power is not an issue, the best way to pursue this goal in allocating new resources is typically to auction them off, on the theory that the highest bidder, i.e., the one with the highest private value, will also generate the greatest benefits to consumers. But that approach can go wrong in the presence of strong wireline or wireless incumbents, since the private value for incumbents in a given locale includes not only the revenue from use of the spectrum but also any benefits gained by preventing rivals from eroding the incumbents’ existing businesses. The latter might be called “foreclosure value” as distinct from “use value.” The total private value of spectrum to any given provider is the sum of these two types of value. However, the “foreclosure value” does not reflect consumer value; to the contrary, it represents the private value of forestalling entry that threatens to inject additional competition into the market.

This is one of the places where pure market forces (whatever that means since we’re already talking about a highly constrained and artificial auction) can work against the social values we’re trying to achieve. I hope the Omnibus Broadband Initiative folks receive the DoJ’s gentle hint as if it were delivered with a 2×4.

[Self-serving:] (I have been posting interviews wit the Broadband Initiative folks at Broadband Strategy Week.

Tagged with: auction • broadband • broadband strategy • broadbandstrategyweek • department of justice • doj • fcc • scrawford • spectrum • susan crawford

Previous: « Yottabytes is a lottabytes || Next: Cellphones prevent Alzheimer’s »

One Response to “Department of Justice on a weakness of auctions. Susan Crawford comments.”

  1. CMS Updates Interest Rate on Medicare Overpayments | Debt and Credit Blog| Free Online Tips and Resourses, on January 17th, 2010 at 1:07 am Said:

    [...] Department of Justice on a weakness of auctions. Susan Crawford comments. (hyperorg.com) [...]

  2.  

Leave a Reply


Web Joho only

 

Entries (RSS)
Copy this link as RSS address

Comments (RSS).

Creative Commons License
Joho the Blog by David Weinberger is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. Share it freely, but attribute it to me, and don't use it commercially without my permission.

Joho the blog uses WordPress blogging software.
Thanks, WordPress!