logo

Let’s just see what happens

Mobile Version

About me

Newsletter

Videos

Speaker

Hard to Read? Choose a style: Style 1 Style 2 Style 3 Default Toggle Sidebars

From circles to networks

Posted on February 26th, 2010

Just a terminological note:

Over the past decade, we’ve gone from talking about social circles to social networks. A circle draws a line around us. Networks draw lines among us.

(Yet more evidence — as if we needed it — that networks are the new paradigm. Bye bye, Information Age!)

Tagged with: 2b2k • social networks

Previous: « 7.5 hours later || Next: Berkman Buzz »

13 Responses to “From circles to networks”

  1. Emil Sotirov, on February 26th, 2010 at 1:11 pm Said:

    Another term for circles is “groups”…

  2.  

  3. Ehud, on February 26th, 2010 at 1:35 pm Said:

    Circles include all the people around us. Networks exclude.

  4.  

  5. Mirek Sopek, on February 26th, 2010 at 4:48 pm Said:

    I believe it is true shift of paradigm. In Circle or Group – our togetherness was limited by some proximity to something or someone – whatever it was: neighbourhod, school, workplace, family, town or country – our new togetherness is limited only by person 2 person link – relation, their number, kind and quality.

    Like it or not – but Web 2.0 is the most important global expression of this new paradigm of social relations….

  6.  

  7. davidw, on February 26th, 2010 at 4:58 pm Said:

    Ehud, I get your point about circles, but I don’t see how networks exclude. Networks connect; that’s why they’re networks.

    Of course, actual social networks can exclude people — you don’t have to friend everyone who asks — but as a mere shape, networks connect.

  8.  

  9. Matthew Theobald, on February 26th, 2010 at 5:45 pm Said:

    always thought “information age” was wrong. Ag, iron, industrial, even nuclear ages were all information ages. Agreed the new term is and should be Network Age

  10.  

  11. marc libarle, on February 26th, 2010 at 6:56 pm Said:

    are you serious? networks have been around since homo sapiens began communicating. as a concept to characterize an age, I don’t think so. it shares the same problematic operational saliency as information age.

  12.  

  13. davidw, on February 26th, 2010 at 7:23 pm Said:

    Marc, of course we’ve had networks, but we haven’t had networks as a communications medium. At least not of this sort.

  14.  

  15. Matthew Theobald, on February 26th, 2010 at 9:31 pm Said:

    nor has it ever been as global and instant.

  16.  

  17. Adina Levin, on February 27th, 2010 at 8:46 pm Said:

    Networks are more visible and addressible now, but I don’t see groups becoming obsolete. It’s useful to be able to see who else is participating in a given thing, and useful to coordinate a set of people for action. People like affiliating and that isn’t going away. Today’s leading models of online social networks, Facebook and Twitter, have very weak support for groups, but that doesn’t mean the phenomenon is dead. There will be interesting interrelationships and overlays.

  18.  

  19. pligg.com, on March 2nd, 2010 at 11:02 am Said:

    Joho the Blog » From circles to networks…

    Joho the Blog » From circles to networks…

  20.  

  21. BookBlog » Blog Archive » The revival of groups in the age of the network - Adina Levin's weblog. For conversation about books I've been reading, social software, and other stuff too., on March 3rd, 2010 at 6:25 pm Said:

    [...] a recent blog post, David Weinberger writes about how networks have surpassed groups in recent years, as ways of [...]

  22.  

  23. Recommending Patty Anklam’s Socializing « Fredzimny's Blog, on March 6th, 2010 at 1:53 pm Said:

    [...] tweeted an observation of David Weinberger’s on how our language has shifted: Over the past decade, we’ve gone from talking about social [...]

  24.  

  25. Patti Anklam » Socializing, on April 4th, 2010 at 11:26 am Said:

    [...] recently tweeted an observation of David Weinberger’s on how our language has shifted: Over the past decade, we’ve gone from talking about social [...]

  26.  

Leave a Reply


Web Joho only

 

Entries (RSS)
Copy this link as RSS address

Comments (RSS).

Creative Commons License
Joho the Blog by David Weinberger is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. Share it freely, but attribute it to me, and don't use it commercially without my permission.

Joho the blog uses WordPress blogging software.
Thanks, WordPress!