<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: [2b2k] Open Access articles accelerate science?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2010/08/29/2b2k-open-access-articles-accelerate-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2010/08/29/2b2k-open-access-articles-accelerate-science/</link>
	<description>Let's just see what happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 09:24:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2010/08/29/2b2k-open-access-articles-accelerate-science/comment-page-1/#comment-62546</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/?p=9758#comment-62546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is more than the system of scholarly publishing that is broken. Look one step farther down (up?) the chain, and you come to the system of tenure award that mandates publication in (tres expensive) tier-1 journals, that in turn necessitates citations from tier-1 journals, that in turn gives certain publishing groups de facto monopolies to charge what they claim are &quot;good value&quot; prices.

Although tenure might have once ensured so-called academic freedom (a myth, really, since during an academic&#039;s most productive years they are anything but free because of the politics of tenure and promotion), that system is considerably broken and abused. Eliminate tenure in favour of continuing appointments (and while you&#039;re at it, eliminate the principle of at-will employment), and that will, in time, reduce the strangle-hold these journals have on academics.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is more than the system of scholarly publishing that is broken. Look one step farther down (up?) the chain, and you come to the system of tenure award that mandates publication in (tres expensive) tier-1 journals, that in turn necessitates citations from tier-1 journals, that in turn gives certain publishing groups de facto monopolies to charge what they claim are &#8220;good value&#8221; prices.</p>
<p>Although tenure might have once ensured so-called academic freedom (a myth, really, since during an academic&#8217;s most productive years they are anything but free because of the politics of tenure and promotion), that system is considerably broken and abused. Eliminate tenure in favour of continuing appointments (and while you&#8217;re at it, eliminate the principle of at-will employment), and that will, in time, reduce the strangle-hold these journals have on academics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stevan Harnad</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2010/08/29/2b2k-open-access-articles-accelerate-science/comment-page-1/#comment-62545</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevan Harnad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/?p=9758#comment-62545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See: Bibliography of Findings on the Open Access Impact Advantage (since 2004)
http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See: Bibliography of Findings on the Open Access Impact Advantage (since 2004)<br />
<a href="http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html" rel="nofollow">http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.389 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-06-16 13:45:47 -->