<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kodacroak: The end of Kodachrome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2010/12/26/kodacroak-the-end-of-kodachrome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2010/12/26/kodacroak-the-end-of-kodachrome/</link>
	<description>Let's just see what happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 09:24:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dung Sae</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2010/12/26/kodacroak-the-end-of-kodachrome/comment-page-1/#comment-73626</link>
		<dc:creator>Dung Sae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 22:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/?p=10132#comment-73626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do accept as true with all of the ideas you&#039;ve introduced for your post. They are really convincing and will certainly work. Nonetheless, the posts are very brief for beginners. May just you please extend them a little from next time? Thank you for the post.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do accept as true with all of the ideas you&#8217;ve introduced for your post. They are really convincing and will certainly work. Nonetheless, the posts are very brief for beginners. May just you please extend them a little from next time? Thank you for the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vuitton handbags</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2010/12/26/kodacroak-the-end-of-kodachrome/comment-page-1/#comment-72546</link>
		<dc:creator>vuitton handbags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 23:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/?p=10132#comment-72546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would like to thnkx for the efforts you might have put in writing this blog. I&#039;m hoping exactly the same high-grade site post from you within the upcoming also. In fact your creative writing skills has inspired me to get my own website now. Truly the blogging is spreading its wings rapidly. Your write up can be a very good example of it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to thnkx for the efforts you might have put in writing this blog. I&#8217;m hoping exactly the same high-grade site post from you within the upcoming also. In fact your creative writing skills has inspired me to get my own website now. Truly the blogging is spreading its wings rapidly. Your write up can be a very good example of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evelyn Walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2010/12/26/kodacroak-the-end-of-kodachrome/comment-page-1/#comment-66302</link>
		<dc:creator>Evelyn Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/?p=10132#comment-66302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sigh.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mama, Don&#8217;t Take My Kodachrome Away &#171; Musings from the Den Mother</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2010/12/26/kodacroak-the-end-of-kodachrome/comment-page-1/#comment-66280</link>
		<dc:creator>Mama, Don&#8217;t Take My Kodachrome Away &#171; Musings from the Den Mother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 16:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/?p=10132#comment-66280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] digital photography and digital projection, but it&#8217;s still worth a moment of silence to mark the end of Kodachrome film, which is no longer made and will no longer be processed after December 30, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] digital photography and digital projection, but it&#8217;s still worth a moment of silence to mark the end of Kodachrome film, which is no longer made and will no longer be processed after December 30, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polaroidiza tu iPhone (o similar) â†’ AdiÃ³s, Kodachrome &#124; zumoestudio</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2010/12/26/kodacroak-the-end-of-kodachrome/comment-page-1/#comment-66092</link>
		<dc:creator>Polaroidiza tu iPhone (o similar) â†’ AdiÃ³s, Kodachrome &#124; zumoestudio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 12:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/?p=10132#comment-66092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] (VÃ­a Joho the Blog). [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (VÃ­a Joho the Blog). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdiÃ³s, Kodachrome</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2010/12/26/kodacroak-the-end-of-kodachrome/comment-page-1/#comment-66091</link>
		<dc:creator>AdiÃ³s, Kodachrome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 12:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/?p=10132#comment-66091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Joho the Blog). Publicado por Wicho # 30/Dic/2010 â€“ Comentarios (0)CategorÃ­as: GeneralCompartir porâ€¦ correo [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Joho the Blog). Publicado por Wicho # 30/Dic/2010 â€“ Comentarios (0)CategorÃ­as: GeneralCompartir porâ€¦ correo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2010/12/26/kodacroak-the-end-of-kodachrome/comment-page-1/#comment-66051</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 08:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/?p=10132#comment-66051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I take 3D pictures on a David White Stereo Realist, and there&#039;s just such an enormous difference between the perfect color and amazing smoothness and  sharpness of Kodachrome over any other film I&#039;ve tried.  With other films, presence of differing grain between the two images creates a 3D &quot;graininess&quot; that just isn&#039;t there with Kodachrome.   The illusion of reality is much, much stronger with Kodachrome than with E6 film.

But since it had to come to an end, I tried to send it out with style.   I just mailed in my last roll -- Christmas morning family pictures taken on a last roll of Kodachrome 25 I saved when Kodak  discontinued it..  One last traditional spin around the block with the best filmstock ever.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take 3D pictures on a David White Stereo Realist, and there&#8217;s just such an enormous difference between the perfect color and amazing smoothness and  sharpness of Kodachrome over any other film I&#8217;ve tried.  With other films, presence of differing grain between the two images creates a 3D &#8220;graininess&#8221; that just isn&#8217;t there with Kodachrome.   The illusion of reality is much, much stronger with Kodachrome than with E6 film.</p>
<p>But since it had to come to an end, I tried to send it out with style.   I just mailed in my last roll &#8212; Christmas morning family pictures taken on a last roll of Kodachrome 25 I saved when Kodak  discontinued it..  One last traditional spin around the block with the best filmstock ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2010/12/26/kodacroak-the-end-of-kodachrome/comment-page-1/#comment-66050</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 07:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/?p=10132#comment-66050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Digital is a deadend--a blind alley.

But you won&#039;t know it until you get to the end of the alley.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digital is a deadend&#8211;a blind alley.</p>
<p>But you won&#8217;t know it until you get to the end of the alley.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrJest</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2010/12/26/kodacroak-the-end-of-kodachrome/comment-page-1/#comment-66045</link>
		<dc:creator>MrJest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 04:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/?p=10132#comment-66045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s the deal: 

I work at a place that simulates the vast EMP and radiation bursts of things like nuclear weapon detonations and solar storms. Our customers range from *CLASSIFIED* to those making things like satellites that live beyond the Earth&#039;s protective magnetosphere and are vulnerable to solar events. Digital cameras just *die* when we attempt to image the moments of these conditions, so we have a handful of film cameras that we screw into observation ports on the simulator machines.

At present, these cameras use increasingly rare &quot;instant&quot; Polaroid film (in black-and-white). Already we spend somewhere around $60 - $80 for a 10-shot cartridge... what are we to do when film goes away entirely (practically speaking; yes I understand that there will always be specialist manufacturers that will provide photographic film - at exorbitant cost)?

At some point we must balance the cost of somehow shielding the innards of digital cameras - if possible, since essentially we need to put a sheet of 1&quot; thick lead in front of the lens that somehow the CCD chip can see the visual spectrum through (anyone invent transparent lead yet?) - or the cost of custom-made film. Either way, it just lends increasing cost to an already costly enterprise ($30K each test at least).

*Sigh*... this was so much easier 20 years ago when I could go down to the local drug store and buy a cartridge of black-and-white on sale for $5.00 ... but time moves on.

-MJ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the deal: </p>
<p>I work at a place that simulates the vast EMP and radiation bursts of things like nuclear weapon detonations and solar storms. Our customers range from *CLASSIFIED* to those making things like satellites that live beyond the Earth&#8217;s protective magnetosphere and are vulnerable to solar events. Digital cameras just *die* when we attempt to image the moments of these conditions, so we have a handful of film cameras that we screw into observation ports on the simulator machines.</p>
<p>At present, these cameras use increasingly rare &#8220;instant&#8221; Polaroid film (in black-and-white). Already we spend somewhere around $60 &#8211; $80 for a 10-shot cartridge&#8230; what are we to do when film goes away entirely (practically speaking; yes I understand that there will always be specialist manufacturers that will provide photographic film &#8211; at exorbitant cost)?</p>
<p>At some point we must balance the cost of somehow shielding the innards of digital cameras &#8211; if possible, since essentially we need to put a sheet of 1&#8243; thick lead in front of the lens that somehow the CCD chip can see the visual spectrum through (anyone invent transparent lead yet?) &#8211; or the cost of custom-made film. Either way, it just lends increasing cost to an already costly enterprise ($30K each test at least).</p>
<p>*Sigh*&#8230; this was so much easier 20 years ago when I could go down to the local drug store and buy a cartridge of black-and-white on sale for $5.00 &#8230; but time moves on.</p>
<p>-MJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayrtfm</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2010/12/26/kodacroak-the-end-of-kodachrome/comment-page-1/#comment-66041</link>
		<dc:creator>jayrtfm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 03:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/?p=10132#comment-66041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kodak blew it in &#039;94. I worked for the NYC lab that had a kodachrome line. Kodak was pushing its 120 size roll film, and photo-cd, and digital retouching stations. Too bad they didn&#039;t listen to the market, and put more of the pieces together.
Instead of leveraging the amazing range of kodachrome, where multiple scans could give you hdr effects, in ways that E-6 films just could not do, they discontinued support and the large format.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kodak blew it in &#8217;94. I worked for the NYC lab that had a kodachrome line. Kodak was pushing its 120 size roll film, and photo-cd, and digital retouching stations. Too bad they didn&#8217;t listen to the market, and put more of the pieces together.<br />
Instead of leveraging the amazing range of kodachrome, where multiple scans could give you hdr effects, in ways that E-6 films just could not do, they discontinued support and the large format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.321 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-06-16 13:04:54 -->