<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Net Neutrality Bot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2011/05/24/the-net-neutrality-bot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2011/05/24/the-net-neutrality-bot/</link>
	<description>Let's just see what happens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 09:24:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Weinberger</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2011/05/24/the-net-neutrality-bot/comment-page-1/#comment-69248</link>
		<dc:creator>David Weinberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 11:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/?p=10629#comment-69248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the one hand, yes, that was raised at the session as the most plausible harm publishing IPs might bring in this case. (Note that punishing uses for running a Net neutrality assessor would be the most extremely ironic violation of Net neutrality imaginable.) On the other, the privacy requirement in this case comes from general EU policies that are (imo) ill-tuned to particular cases and overly cautious about privacy; risks can never be removed and always have to be balanced.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the one hand, yes, that was raised at the session as the most plausible harm publishing IPs might bring in this case. (Note that punishing uses for running a Net neutrality assessor would be the most extremely ironic violation of Net neutrality imaginable.) On the other, the privacy requirement in this case comes from general EU policies that are (imo) ill-tuned to particular cases and overly cautious about privacy; risks can never be removed and always have to be balanced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Weinberger (yes, I am related)</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2011/05/24/the-net-neutrality-bot/comment-page-1/#comment-69245</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Weinberger (yes, I am related)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 03:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/?p=10629#comment-69245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Would the privacy problem be that your carrier, like Verizon or Cablevision, could see the IP, know it is theirs and give you trouble for participating in the program, such as giving you worse service, higher fees, etc?  I don&#039;t know, I&#039;m only speculating.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would the privacy problem be that your carrier, like Verizon or Cablevision, could see the IP, know it is theirs and give you trouble for participating in the program, such as giving you worse service, higher fees, etc?  I don&#8217;t know, I&#8217;m only speculating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.455 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-06-16 11:57:04 -->