Joho the Blog

Times cuts down on free access

Why? Does the Times have research that shows that when someone is denied access to her eleventh NYT article, she’s going to cave in and buy a subscription for $195/year? Because my informal market research — I sat myself in an airless room, asked myself some questions, and rewarded myself with m&m’s — indicates that I will just get more annoyed at the NYTimes, and regret its insistence on losing its place in our culture.

PS: No, I don’t know how to save the newspaper industry.

3 Responses to “”

  1. Then again…Just blog the article and click on your own link…you get right in…

  2. NYT. I remember that. I used to have it on my browser startup. I haven’t read an actual NYT article for at least 3 years, maybe longer. Are they still publishing then? How quaint.

  3. We have a print subscription, so we have unlimited access, but I would not be paying for it otherwise. I do like their coverage generally.

    My problem with the headline is that I thought they meant they were reverting their policy back to allowing unlimited access, when, instead, they are further restricting access. Obviously, not everyone reads it that way.

Leave a Reply

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield

Web Joho only

Comments (RSS).  RSS icon

Creative Commons License
Joho the Blog by David Weinberger is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.

Creative Commons license: Share it freely, but attribute it to me, and don't use it commercially without my permission.

Joho the Blog gratefully uses WordPress blogging software.
Thank you, WordPress!