Joho the Blog
An Entry from the Archives

« Ask Not for Whom the Spam Tolls || Back to Blog | Death of an Alpha Male »

March 14, 2003

We Are Waging Peace

Gary Lawrence Murphy sent out this meme-ful piece that's circulating on the Net:


Waging Peace in the world -

Dr. Robert Muller, former assistant secretary general of the United Nations, now Chancellor emeritus of the University of Peace in Costa Rica was one of the people who witnessed the founding of the U.N. and has worked in support of or inside the U.N. ever since. Recently he was in San Francisco to be honored for his service to the world through the U.N. and through his writings and teachings for peace. At age eighty, Dr. Muller surprised, even stunned, many in the audience that day with his most positive assessment of where the world stands now regarding war and peace.

I (do not know how the original person is) was there at the gathering and I myself was stunned by his remarks. What he said turned my head around and offered me a new way to see what is going on in the world. My synopsis of his remarks is below:

"I'm so honored to be here," he said. "I'm so honored to be alive at such a miraculous time in history. I'm so moved by what's going on in our world today." (: I was shocked. I thought — Where has he been? What has he been reading? Has he seen the newspapers? Is he senile? Has he lost it? What is he talking about?)

Dr. Muller proceeded to say, "Never before in the history of the world has there been a global, visible, public, viable, open dialogue and conversation about the very legitimacy of war".

The whole world is in now having this critical and historic dialogue — listening to all kinds of points of view and positions about going to war or not going to war. In a huge global public conversation the world is asking- "Is war legitimate? Is it illegitimate? Is there enough evidence to warrant an attack? Is there not enough evidence to warrant an attack? What will be the consequences? The costs? What will happen after a war? How will this set off other conflicts? What might be peaceful alternatives? What kind of negotiations are we not thinking of? What are the real intentions for declaring war?"

All of this, he noted, is taking place in the context of the United Nations Security Council, the body that was established in 1949 for exactly this purpose. He pointed out that it has taken us more than fifty years to realize that function, the real function of the U.N. And at this moment in history— the United Nations is at the center of the stage. It is the place where these conversations are happening, and it has become in these last months and weeks, the most powerful governing body on earth, the most powerful container for the world's effort to wage peace rather than war. Dr. Muller was almost in tears in recognition of the fulfillment of this dream.

We are not at war," he kept saying. We, the world community, are WAGING peace. It is difficult, hard work. It is constant and we must not let up. It is working and it is an historic milestone of immense proportions. It has never happened before - never in human history - and it is happening now - every day every hour - waging peace through a global conversation. He pointed out that the conversation questioning the validity of going to war has gone on for hours, days, weeks, months and now more than a year, and it may go on and on. "We're in peacetime," he kept saying. "Yes, troops are being moved. Yes, warheads are being lined up. Yes, the aggressor is angry and upset and spending a billion dollars a day preparing to attack. But not one shot has been fired. Not one life has been lost. There is no war. It's all a conversation."

It is tense, it is tough, it is challenging, AND we are in the most significant and potent global conversation and public dialogue in the history of the world. This has not happened before on this scale ever before - not before WWI or WWII, not before Vietnam or Korea, this is new and it is a stunning new era of Global listening, speaking, and responsibility.

In the process, he pointed out, new alliances are being formed. Russia and China on the same side of an issue is an unprecedented outcome. France and Germany working together to wake up the world to a new way of seeing the situation. The largest peace demonstrations in the history of the world are taking place — and we are not at war! Most peace demonstrations in recent history took place when a war was already waging, sometimes for years, as in the case of Vietnam.

"So this," he said, "is a miracle. This is what "waging peace " looks like."

No matter what happens, history will record that this is a new era, and that the 21st century has been initiated with the world in a global dialogue looking deeply, profoundly and responsibly as a global community at the legitimacy of the actions of a nation that is desperate to go to war.

Through these global peace - waging efforts, the leaders of that nation are being engaged in further dialogue, forcing them to rethink, and allowing all nations to participate in the serious and horrific decision to go to war or not.

Dr. Muller also made reference to a recent New York Times article that pointed out that up until now there has been just one superpower - the United States, and that that has created a kind of blindness in the vision of the U.S. But now, Dr. Muller asserts, there are two superpowers: the United States and the merging, surging voice of the people of the world.

All around the world, people are waging peace. To Robert Muller, one of the great advocates of the United Nations, it is nothing short of a miracle and it is working.

Posted by D. Weinberger at March 14, 2003 09:00 AM


Comments

Thanks for providing this forum for comment. But...

What a load of meaningless babble. The U.N. is more irrelevant now than at any point in its history. If anything, the U.N., in its inability to stand up to a war making, genocidal thug is making the prospect of the next big war more likely.

War is hell. Most of us hate to even imagine the brutal act of killing another human being. Unfortunately, there are just enough war-loving sickos in the world to ruin it for the rest of us. Our best hope at long lasting peace is to vanquish war makers, like Saddam, as they rear their heads. Then, we can sheath our weapons and enjoy the fruits of peace until the next madman gathers an army. The whole thought of "waging peace" by allowing one's self to be slaughtered is patently foolish.

Posted by: sean | March 14, 2003 09:22 AM


Sean,
Re-read the post because I think you're missing the thrust of what he is saying.

He is not saying what we should do or even what the U.N. should do. He's speaking on what we are doing, what is going on in world politics right now. This is an observation, which you may very well disagree with, not a call for any type of action.

One thing I have been strong voiced about in my discussions about Iraq is that the dialogue that is going on in the UN is healthy. That is diplomacy! The UN would be irrelevant if they let the US do whatever it wants.

Posted by: Ryan | March 14, 2003 09:42 AM


Which "war-making, genocidal thug making the prospect of the next big war more likely" are you talking about ?

For another perspective, see this article from today's Globe and Mail

http://www.globeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20030314/UPEACM/International/Idx

Posted by: Jon Husband | March 14, 2003 03:14 PM


the U.N., in its inability to stand up to a war making, genocidal thug

Actually, I think the U.N. is standing up to GW Bush quite admirably.

Posted by: sweet reason | March 14, 2003 10:37 PM


Just when I was getting depressed by this whole sorry situation, Dr Muller comes up with a completely different way to look at it.

My belief is that the present threatened actions led by the USA are more likely to give license to (ie cause) the "next madman that gathers an army", and many others besides, to wage war with even more vehemence - exactly because the most powerful nation decides to ignore the UN, decides to ignore the present world-wide "conversation".

But perhaps there is reason for hope after all - at least there is a debate going on world wide, and this has not happened before.

Maybe it will be better later, but maybe not for 100 years. In his book "Philosophy and Social Hope", Richard Rorty has an essay "Looking Backwards from the year 2096", which may prove to be prophetic. In it he "attempts to look back at twentieth-century America from a vantage point of the twenty-first century". He begins with this:

"Our long, hesitant, painful recovery, over the last five decades, from the breakdown of democratic institutions during the Dark Years (2014 - 2044) has changed our political vocabulary, as well as our sense of the relation between between the moral order and the economic order.".

Combine this essay with Dr Muller's remarks and there is reason for hope - at least for my grandchildren.

Posted by: Vergil | March 16, 2003 04:33 AM


The artical is wonderful and inspires hope based on the angle it is looking at things from. When though are we going to stop waiting for the polititians (the UN included) to start Waging Peace? I have come to realise that waging peace comes from the ground up and is the responsibility of the 'People' not the polititians. Men like Bush and Saddam wage war, The UN (thanks for trying guys) tries to keep the peace after the shit has hit the fan, while the rest of us mostly sit back and watch, we are but mere spectators. Politics is like watching a whole season of football, war is just the finals - till next season, look around you there are people waging peace at great cost to themselves, 'Doctors without Borders' is just one amazing example. Join them, and help them WAGE PEACE. Waging peace is the link we have been missing. It may not become a political policy anytime soon, so if I was you I wouldn't wait too long to take things into your own hands, beyond voting for the best of a crap bunch. If one was to sit down and start a list of the advantages and benifits of Waging Peace, think you would find solutions to the problems the world faces. Have you ever noticed that with War one usually "Declares War" and then it starts through the waging of war. Maybe all we need to do is declare "Peace" and then start openly waging it. Would love your feedback. Keep talking guys and girls but do try to think out of the box. And think about this, Just like there is no spoon (Matrix) - "There is no Box!" SO thinking outside of it should not be too difficult.

Posted by: Morgs | September 10, 2003 10:28 AM


Post a comment

Guidelines for Commenting

Basically, you can say what you want. (Click here for the fine print.)

If you haven't left a comment here before, your comment may be put into a queue for me to approve. Sorry for the delay. Blame the damn spammers.