Joho the Blog
|
|
|
April 24, 2003
Tough choice among sessions! A Microsoft researcher is talking about social software, Mitch Kapor is talking about Chandler, and Meg "Megnut" Hourihan is talking about "From the Margins of the Writable Web." Meg's always interesting and I love her title, so I'm here. The tools for reading weblogs aren't as developed as for writing them. Meg points to sites doing interesting things. E.g., weblogs that are tied to geographic areas. (You can put your geographic information into your blog via geourl.org.) Also, sites are getting more explicit in their social relationships. E.g., create an OPML file of all your friends and put it in your weblog... This is great stuff, but I can't read the slides from in back and thus can't get the URLs. I'll get them from Meg's site when she posts them. You should too. On to the Microsoft guy... Marc Smith is talking about Netscan, a project for data mining newsgroups to see what we can learn about their social organization. For example, the number of cross-posted threads can indicate whether the newsgroup needs to fork. And 67% of Usenet threads have only two messages. Does this indicate success or failure? E.g., a customer support group wants short threads. How do you tell? One guy posted 95 times and every one was a reply. And posted 25 out of 26 days. He's likely to be a high value "answer person." He thinks this type of analysis will be used by professional organizations trying to keep their discussion lists healthy. What makes an online community healthy? He says that you should look at things like time to reply, number of posts, percentage of messages replied to, retention of leaders, etc. He shows a user-friendly web page that Microsoft Research is trying to get Microsoft to build. He demonstrates reading bar codes to get discussion threads about the bar-coded object. (It's called AURA: Advanced User Research Application) Fascinating. And Smith is a terrific presenter, getting laughter and applause along the way...tough for a Microsoft guy in this crowd. Posted
by D. Weinberger at April 24, 2003 09:40 PM
TrackBackListed below are links to weblogs that reference [ETech] Meg Hourihan & Microsoft Data Mining:
» CES Blog from Tracked on April 25, 2003 12:18 AM
» CES Blog from Tracked on April 27, 2003 08:37 PM |
Comments
The problems of making weblogs more searchable/readable/accessible is a difficult one. Google is a good tool, but too infrequently updated. Any external app might only restrict the natural structure of the web. What I envision for something like Meg's Lafayette Project is a browser-integrated toolbar that's easy to turn on/off that might suggest relevant content based on the current page. Almost like some spyware apps, but not evil. Of course the constant crawling needed to support such a project is a bit prohibitive.
Posted by: john | April 25, 2003 01:14 PM
Try the Text Mining software developed by Robert English and Hari Mailvaganam.
Posted by: Joseph Chan | October 3, 2003 01:37 AM