Joho the Blog
An Entry from the Archives

« Little but useful || Back to Blog | Busted »

July 01, 2003

The unspoken of groups

Clay Shirky has posted his seminal keynote at the O'Reilly Emerging Tech conference:

I want to talk a pattern I've seen over and over again in social software that supports large and long-lived groups. And that pattern is the pattern described in the title of this talk: "A Group Is Its Own Worst Enemy."

So I just posted my comments from the same conference which were in some ways a response to Clay's presentation:

I want to suggest there's a reason why we keep making the mistake that Clay specifically points to: the failure to adopt a group "constitution." It's not because we don't learn. It's because of the importance - in even the most vocal groups - of the unspoken.

Posted by D. Weinberger at July 1, 2003 05:58 PM


Comments

It's that unspoken - that I wanted to resolve when it comes to the ThreadsML site. I don't have access to change-update it. Nobody else does either - except for you.

But instead of asking for access, I thought that getting Ben H. to do some copy editing might be the right approach. But NOOOOOOOOOOOO (said in along drawn out sarcastic manner.......)

So we still have a nebulous site - even though we're getting traction technically and working example code (and a cool, re-entrant conversation example.)

Now some would call that - just the ants being unorganized. Others might call it 'stoppage'. Me - I'm fascinated with the unspoken, chaordic realities of trying to get something done in this NEA world. This is the 'problem' with a world of ends.

With no boss - basic things never get done.

Posted by: Marc Canter | July 1, 2003 09:15 PM


Marc, I'm sending you the login info for the site.

Posted by: dweinberger | July 1, 2003 10:53 PM


And often, with many bosses, not much gets spoken.

Where's Yossarian when we need him ?

Posted by: Jon | July 2, 2003 10:50 AM


Post a comment

Guidelines for Commenting

Basically, you can say what you want. (Click here for the fine print.)

If you haven't left a comment here before, your comment may be put into a queue for me to approve. Sorry for the delay. Blame the damn spammers.