Joho the Blog
|
|
13, 2003 Journalism's Master Narrative Jay Rosen's posted a brilliant piece on the role of the "master narrative" in political reporting. That's a term borrowed from the Post Modernists and Rosen uses it to point out that the common themes of political reporting are social constructs, not natural. Politics gets reported as a horse race not because candidates are horses in a race but because that's the narrative form we've created and accepted. As Jay says in another piece, " Journalism schools don't teach this, but it's nonetheless true: Facts can't tell you how they want to be framed." (He should know; he's chair of journalism studies at NYU.)
This is George Lakoff territory and it needs to be more fully explored.
There's no escaping narratives, a mortal blow to objectivity's dream of hegemony. Narratives area how we understand, not an obstacle to understanding. But it's important to remember that events can be incorporated into many different narratives. (My Inner PoMo wants to blurt out that events are not atoms independent of the narratives that take them up.) And, it would be useful to cast politics into alternative master narratives.
For example, maybe the elections of 2004 could be reported not as a horse race but as a conversation. Or as a form of co-evolution. Or as the way in which a community forms its will. Or as how a nation makes up its mind. Or as the story of how many-ness becomes one.
Unfortunately, we have only a little control over which narratives master us. But it'd be worth trying...
Jay has just posted a piece on how you "cover" 133 candidates for governor that touches on some of the same issues. Posted by D. Weinberger at 13, 2003 10:30 AM |
TrackBack
Comments
Post a comment |