Joho the Blog
|
|
|
September 21, 2003
Marilyn in Parade sets the following problem. You are in a pitch dark room. You are handed a deck that has ten cards turned face up shuffled into it. Your job is to sort the deck into two piles, each of which contains the same number of up-turned cards. The solution involves no night-vision goggles or the ability to read through one's fingers. It's just so damn clever that you're going to go D'oh when you turn the column upside down and read her answer. Or, you could click here to get a javascript popup with the answer. Posted
by D. Weinberger at September 21, 2003 10:36 AM
TrackBackListed below are links to weblogs that reference By gum, Marilyn Vos Savant is the world's smartest person:
» A Monday Puzzle from Big Red Blob Tracked on September 22, 2003 03:48 PM
» blackjack from blackjack Tracked on March 21, 2005 08:28 AM
» blackjack from blackjack Tracked on March 26, 2005 03:29 AM |
Comments
I was going to take a knife and cut through the deck, chopping every card in half. That would give me two decks with exactly the same number of up and down cards!
Her answer is better :-)
Posted by: Pito Salas | September 21, 2003 08:44 PM
took me a minute...
count out ten and turn them over?
If none... 10 vs. 10
If one... 9 vs. 9
etc.
Posted by: anon | September 22, 2003 08:23 PM
thought n thought---didnt work even reading answer, so googled you this am and thanks to you-all i got it. very clever (or im not, but anyway) thanks for posting it, ill sleep a little better tonight. btw-i sent your version to a number of people, so you're famous--billr
Posted by: Anonymous | September 23, 2003 06:27 PM
{Spoiler?}
The parity answer is indeed clever. What interests me is the implicit assumptions we do and don't make. In this case the notion that two piles mean two even piles. Turning over the cards is also questionable but I'll grant that since thinking of flipping the cards by itself is not the answer without seeing the parity solution.
Strange timing -- I found this because I was looking for her column online for the 28th (today) where she correctly points out that students blame themselves for not understanding a teacher when it is really the teacher's failure.
Overall, I do confess to reading Parade along with the comics in the Globe. Her columns do have some insights but also some big misses that are the flip side of the card problem -- it's a question of which implicit assumptions are real constraints and which are self-imposed.
This week I can't help but observe that trying to coin a word for www. as dubdot is wrong -- it sexdot by that reasoning - three double u's is a sextuple u. But then the column is not very web savvy -- it's a generational thing.
Posted by: Bob Frankston | September 28, 2003 01:17 PM
While Marilyn's overall intelligence is, in a word, incredible, the difficulty of this problem is not. A similar form of this problem appeared recently in a competition called "Tournament of Towns" which is held in Russia or some part of Europe (sorry I don't remember exactly). The problem involved a million coins with 32 of them face up in the dark. It was an Easy or Junior level question, meaning it was given to 9th and 10th graders. This problem is but a simple example of basic mathematical parity and logic. Take a look at some of the solutions to high school olympiad mathematics problems. There you will find true cleverness.
Posted by: Math | December 27, 2003 10:11 PM
http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/mtarchive/002022.html
Posted by: Anonymous | July 1, 2004 07:52 AM
turn on a light.
Posted by: Anthony | September 16, 2005 10:25 AM