Joho the Blog
An Entry from the Archives

« Kevin Rips and Burns S. Jobs || Back to Blog | [POPTECH] Xeni and Kevin on Weblogs »

October 18, 2003

[POPTECH] Weblog

Clay Shirky is going to talk about "Weblog Ecosystem: Power Laws, Fake Estates, Weblogs and the Media." He defines weblogs as anyting that is simple enough to enable anyone to publish on the web, every day if she or he wants to. (Not a close enough quote, unfortunately.) He's talking about power laws.

Blogs form loose conversations. Link density grows according to Metcalfe's Law. (Metcalfe is in the audience; he's one of the founders of PopTech.) Preferential connectivity. Sites can scan the weblog world and see the links. "Link structure is a proxy for audience." That is, if there are lots of inbound links, there are probably lots of readers.

Clay in February checked Technorati to see the distribution of links and found a power law curve: a very rapid collapse and then a long, slow tail. (Clay says that Jason Kottke had the same idea at the same time.) This is definitely not a bell curve. Most bloggers have less than average traffic. Half the link density is taken up by just 5% of the weblogs. And adding more bloggers makes the curve even steeper: if you start a blog, you are likely to link to one of the top weblogs but they are quite unlikely to link to you.

The links in the tail tend to be among people linking to one another, the pattern of a dinner party. At LiveJournal, people aren't posting in public; they're posting to friends. "You could go down to the mall and sit in the food court, and listen in on a conversation among a bunch of teenagers ... but you're the weird one, not them.")

The links at the top form a broadcast pattern. Glenn Reynolds can't link back to everyone who links to him. He has too many readers to be able to open up comments.

These patterns apply outside of the world of weblogs. Power laws apply in many places. E.g., of word frequencies follows a power law.

The 20th century was the century of mass media. We're comfortable with that. Weblogs are a rapid "do-over" of the 21st century. It's the first medium we've seen go from zero to important. But there are three differences from mass media:

1. No central control

2. No special technology - a teenager bitching about his parents and Glenn Reynolds use the same technology. The same technology scales across 7 orders of magnitude.

3. No scarcity. It's "fake estate" not "real estate." Construction increases the size of the system rather than taking some of it out of circulation.

The differences among the patterns of weblog connectivity are all social differences, not technological ones. So, what does this mean for us?

First, "Broadcast happens." Even though blogs are two-way, the broadcast pattern has re-emerged. "The broadcast pattern arises out of the social wiring of large groups of people."

[Yeah but...broadcast reemerges, but it non-broadcast clusters also emerge. That long tail has a lot of people in it. Sorry to be a fanatic, but look at how Dean supporters are organizing themselves. And Clay points to Oprah Winfrey's book clubs as an example of an attempt to put clusters — local book clubs — at the edges of the broadcast spokes.]

Second, "There is an A List (and you're not on it)."

Third, "Freedom vs. Equality." When you increase the freedom in the system, you get imbalances and power curves.

Q: [Me] It's not that broadcast is all there is; the length of the tail shows the importance of non-broadcast.

A: Yes.

Q: How many weblogs will there be?

A: See the Perseus study.

Q: How about the changing role of authority?

A: The next move is to derive expertise from the link structure. It hasn't happened yet but it will because it has to.

Clay is, of course, brilliant but he's also a brilliant presenter. He argues for a point, shows its broad impact, and gets laughs from the audience just by being smart. Yikes.

Posted by D. Weinberger at October 18, 2003 09:38 AM


TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference [POPTECH] Weblog:

» Communication is content from Seb's Open Research
[Read More]

Tracked on October 21, 2003 08:36 AM

» Communication is content from Many-to-Many
Richard MacManus is not resigned to describing C-list blogging (i.e., one-to-few, by far the most prevalent mode in the blogosphere) as mere "communication": I think there is a comparison between some C-List bloggers and student radio stations, or pira... [Read More]

Tracked on October 21, 2003 08:39 AM

» Communication is content from Many-to-Many
Richard MacManus is not resigned to describing C-list blogging (i.e., one-to-few, by far the most prevalent mode in the blogosphere) as mere "communication": I think there is a comparison between some C-List bloggers and student radio stations, or pira... [Read More]

Tracked on October 21, 2003 08:42 AM

» Communication is content from Many-to-Many
Richard MacManus is not resigned to describing C-list blogging (i.e., one-to-few, by far the most prevalent mode in the blogosphere) as mere "communication": I think there is a comparison between some C-List bloggers and student radio stations, or pira... [Read More]

Tracked on October 21, 2003 08:44 AM

» On Broadcasting from Read/Write Web
The Two-Way Web is a very simple concept. [Read More]

Tracked on October 23, 2003 07:03 AM

» Of Attention Landscapes and Personal Media from McGee's Musings
Of Attention Landscapes and Personal Media Apparently provoked by Weinberger's blog on Shirky at PopTech , we seem to be having a reprise of the power law brouhaha , with A-lists and C-lists exposed and waving about . [Read More]

Tracked on November 15, 2003 07:03 PM

» Here's a weird set of connections: Blogs and Partial Birth Abortion from Pito's Blog
I had an interesting discussion with David Weinberg recently about the future of blogs. One of the side trips of the discussion was that age old question: What's a blog? Is it a blog? My gut reaction was, who cares what you call it. David wrote up some... [Read More]

Tracked on May 17, 2004 10:11 PM

» On Broadcasting from Read/Write Web
The Two-Way Web is a very simple concept. It's all about normal everyday people having a publishing platform on the Web. Sounds reasonable to me, but a thread on Many-to-Many this week has complicated the issue. Here's my summary, based... [Read More]

Tracked on May 22, 2004 02:14 AM

Comments

Clay messed up twice, IMO

First, he said that once you get to the top of the list, you get to stay there, and didn't finish...as long as you remain well-behaved and don't get caught. It is easy to destroy someone's life if they speak against the official line, from PeeWee Herman, to Scott Ritter, to Valerie Plame. We should all watch Elia Kazan's Face in the Crowd as we think about Rush Limbaugh.

Second, he said there is no way to hold two way conversations with 1 million fans. A little adaptive clustering of natural language would serve to organize responses into the top 10 comments which other readers can either agree with or suggest a new one seeking statistical relevance from the community.

Posted by: jordan | October 18, 2003 11:31 AM


I thought Clay meant not that all A-listers will always stay A-listers, just that the list doesn't vary that much over time.

Posted by: dweinberger | October 18, 2003 01:44 PM


Clay is dead wrong on persistence. No 5 on Technorati (above BoingBoing and Glenn Reynolds) is a Blog in Arabic. It wasn't there last time I looked.
Power laws imply cascades of arbitrary size too.

I wrote (somewhat opaquely, but with lots of graphs) on this a while back:

http://homepage.mac.com/kevinmarks/powerlaws.html

Posted by: Kevin Marks | October 19, 2003 01:23 AM


Clay did not say there is no turnover among the A-List. He said it's relatively stable.

Posted by: dweinberger | October 19, 2003 09:14 AM


Post a comment

Guidelines for Commenting

Basically, you can say what you want. (Click here for the fine print.)

If you haven't left a comment here before, your comment may be put into a queue for me to approve. Sorry for the delay. Blame the damn spammers.