Joho the Blog
|
|
|
October 24, 2003
Bill Seitz is waxing provocative about metadata. (I'm happy to say that something I wrote instigated it.) Among other tidbits: "We need a semantic analyzer to tell us how much 'new information' is contained in the full content relative to that predicted by the metadata" That is — as I understand it — because the metadata abstract is more general than that which is being abstracted, the abstract may well hide what's new and interesting. It's the old genus-species approach where the genus tells you what it has in common and the species tells you what's different. Posted
by D. Weinberger at October 24, 2003 12:33 PM
|
Comments
That's an interesting way to put it.
I might say, "try to link to the primary sources."
Posted by: sheila | October 24, 2003 11:18 PM
But.. then the semantic analyzer is creating metadata about the metadata, isn't it?
Posted by: Tim | October 26, 2003 01:00 AM
These secret identities serve a variety of purposes, and they help us to understand how variables work. In this lesson, we'll be writing a little less code than we've done in previous articles, but we'll be taking a detailed look at how variables live and work.
Posted by: Fulk | January 13, 2004 10:37 AM