Joho the Blog
|
|
|
March 04, 2004
Ed Cone writes about what conclusions to draw from the fact that Maryland's use of electronic voting machines on Tuesday seemed to go well: "'Election officials will think that this validates the system, that now we can all see that it works just fine - but that's not the case,' says Michael Wertheimer, a systems-security consultant..." My favorite bit:
Oh, I see. Let me paraphrase: "The system worked perfectly and I was very happy with it, except for the gnawing fear that it disenfranchised me of my most basic right as a citizen." Electronic voting, without a voter-verifiable paper trail, inevitably introduces doubt into the system that should be the paradigm of lock box security. (It is inevitable because the digital only has a symbolic relationship to the real, analog world. But that's a different story...the same story about why computers that model thought aren't themselves thinking. But I digress.) Cross-posted at Loose Democracy Posted
by D. Weinberger at March 4, 2004 10:36 AM
TrackBackListed below are links to weblogs that reference Paperless democracy's test:
» E-Voting and Trust in Democracy from Discourse.net Tracked on March 4, 2004 04:24 PM |
Comments
It's a blog. Digress at will.
Posted by: Nick Douglas | March 4, 2004 11:54 AM
They use voting machines in India (altho I have never voted in India so this is based on hearsay). However many of the population are illiterate. So candidates are represented by symbols. So the machine look like one-armed bandits. Which given the state of Indian democracy may well be very appropriate metaphor.
Posted by: Daniel Byron | March 7, 2004 07:47 PM