Joho the Blog
An Entry from the Archives

« Opening locked doors || Back to Blog | [sxsw] Trippi »

March 14, 2004

[sxsw] MoveOn.org

Eli Pariser and Zach Exley, names probably familiar from your inbox — Eli has a disconcertingly consistent pattern of vowels and consonants — are talking to a packed crowd of about 400, explaining how MoveOn.org got started and how the Internet is enabling us to rebuild some of the community that's been lost over the decades.

They humbly stress how they stumbled into success, and make the good point that, when something succeeds, inevitably people look for geniuses which is "terribly disempowering" to everyone else.

They stress that we're just at the beginning of the Net-izing of politics. "In a few years, we won't be talking about a 2 million person email list. And we won't be focusing on MoveOn. We'll be talking about 40 million people and hopefully lots of groups."

They say that the report of 6M names on a Republican list is an exaggeration, and if they have that many, it's because they bought 'em and thus the names are less effective. "The Republicans are doing a good job on the Internet, but don't be intimidated by that 6M number. It's more like 400,000."

"And they haven't yet learned the power of having a two-way dialogue."

What will the connective platform in 2008, they're asked. Who knows, they answer.

The unsinkable Molly Ivins introduced them. She loves the Net and the way it's connecting us. I'd take issue with her call to find "some way" to get rid of the bad information on the Net — get used to it, Molly — but what a treat to hear her talk, if only for a few minutes.

[Cross-posted at Loose Democracy]

Posted by D. Weinberger at March 14, 2004 04:15 PM


TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference [sxsw] MoveOn.org:

» Joho on [sxsw] from Zinoblog
[Read More]

Tracked on March 15, 2004 11:02 PM

» Joho on [sxsw] from Zinoblog
[Read More]

Tracked on March 15, 2004 11:04 PM

» Joho on [sxsw] from Zinoblog
[Read More]

Tracked on March 15, 2004 11:05 PM

» SXSW Round Up #1 from
I decided that instead of blogging SXSW I would blog everyone else blogging SXSW. SXSW Community Blog SXSWblog.com SXSW Moblog v-2 Organisation: -The name of this brand is talking heads: year two -The name of this brand is talkig heads... [Read More]

Tracked on March 16, 2004 12:43 AM

Comments

I think it will be more like 40M individuals, loosely joined. The issue is not to figure out how to get a mass audience on the net; it is more an issue of getting relationships and affinities aligned. There will be a few lists with a few hundred thousand or million people tuning in (thanks to those indviduals' self selected interest and the submitters ongoing ability to provide them relevant and authentic feeds), followed by passalongs and co-blogging by X% of those recipients.

Right now, I am taking selections from my RSS readings, and passing them to a short list of my friends of similar mindsets. So maybe this is less about disintermediation (which, as it grows the the multi-M's approaches a form of "media") and more about localization or personalization of media sources. FWIW

Posted by: MartyJ | March 14, 2004 06:52 PM


The Bush administration has been effective at controlling the flow of information during the Iraq war. One thing that they have been particularly effective at is removing the human face. The recently published photos of our war dead help to dramatize this point.

We need to bring the human cost of the war home to everyone. How about doing this by building a pyramid of the 700+ coffins of American dead?

Think about it.

Posted by: MRD | April 27, 2004 11:05 AM


I don't know whether this is the proper place to insert an opinion having nothing to do with the Bush Administration controlling information about the war, listed above, but I am using this forum since I can't seem to find any place else in the MoveOn site to make my case.
I have commented before that MoveOn.org is the perfect place for a mobilization of two million emails to Washington to demand a law requiring a paper trail for every voting machine used in the forthcoming election. I just read somewhere that the house and senate have both just decided not to bother with that. Naturally, it is to Republican interests to leave the door open for any necessary last-minute changes to assure victory in November. (I am not suggesting that this is anybody's thought). It looks like the only thing that will turn the tide is a massive outpouring from the public demanding fool-proof (as much as possible) machines in November. True Majority is staging a massive campaign called The Computer Ate My Vote, drawing attention to print-out needs in a state-by-state effort. California, as a result, may refuse to use paperless machines. This would provide a real impetus for other states to follow suit. My point is that a e-mail campaign by MoveOn.org to national representatives and senators, coordinating with this True Majority effort would be a tremendous step in the right direction. Why all this work to register people, only to lose in the end?

B. Grotegut

Posted by: Anonymous | April 30, 2004 10:40 AM


Bush knows that he cannot win the majority of votes in a fair election, Heck, he did not win the majority of voties in 2000. After all the mistakes he has made. Do you think he will win in 2004?

Democrats need to ensure a paper trail so that we do NOT have a repeat of the irregularities of 2000.

Posted by: CarlosX | August 16, 2004 08:36 AM


Imagine this:

President bush sits in a classroom full of children when an aid walks up and wispers in his ear, Mr. President we have just been notified that we are tracking 6 intercontinetal ballistic missle inbound to the United States, We are under attack. Mr. Bush reaches over to a shelf and picks up a book titled My pet goat. For the next 7 minutes he sits bewildered, tumbing through the book presumably looking at the pictures. By the time he reacts to this attack 7 minutes have past. Is there enough time now to react? probably not. The mushroom cloud is upon us. Is this senario far fetched? maybe not. Will this president be prepared? probably not. Can we afford to take the chance with Bush? Absolutley not. Lets illustrate these fact in a TV comercial and really highlite whether this president is someone we want to trust with 4 more years. Let them explain Bush's service to the country.

Brian Entwistle

Posted by: Brian Entwistle | August 23, 2004 03:56 PM


You removed my name from your mailing list inadvertently. Please restore.

bobbi369@earthlink.net

Posted by: roberta leibow | September 29, 2005 04:30 PM


Post a comment

Guidelines for Commenting

Basically, you can say what you want. (Click here for the fine print.)

If you haven't left a comment here before, your comment may be put into a queue for me to approve. Sorry for the delay. Blame the damn spammers.