Joho the Blog
|
|
|
April 17, 2004
I'm at the second BloggerCon, Dave Winer's do at Harvard. Dave begins by sketching the shape of the conference. Then he leads us in a sing-along of Take Me Out to the Ballgame and the US national anthem. Really. Now it's on to Jay Rosen's session on blogging and journalism. He's running it like a 100-person seminar, which is the format of sessions here. Why is blogging moving towards journalism, Jay begins by asking. There is, of course, a spread of opinion. Are blogs moving towards journalism? Are they more like op-eds? Are they muckrakers? Could blogs move towards journalism if they didn't have real journalists to rely on? Is there a sharp distinction in that journalists have a set of practices and ethics they follow? How does blogging change journalists? Does it alter their attempt to be objective? Does blogging hurt the relationship with sources? I did a session on blogs in business. "Did a session" means that I facilitated a group discussion. There are no panels here, which is turning out to be a great choice. The moderators actively facilitated, in the mode of Jeff Jarvis' stellar session last year, keeping the discussions moving and focused. I highly recommend this format to other conference organizers: The audience is the panel. I've spent most of the day taking notes for the IRC, so I don't have notes for you. Here are some links, though, many from the last session I was able to attend, the one on blogging and religion: Religion for the non-religious The Revealer on Bush's religious language Posted
by D. Weinberger at April 17, 2004 06:35 PM
TrackBackListed below are links to weblogs that reference [bc] BloggerCon:
» "Hyper-Commenting" at Bloggercon from What Ralph Knows Tracked on April 17, 2004 10:16 PM |
Comments
that's awesome. can you share some of what was said about islamicate?
Posted by: islamoyankee | April 18, 2004 08:50 AM
Islamicate was one of a couple of dozen sites that came up in conversation. I think it was in the context of religiously-committed sites that talk about other religions as well.
Posted by: David Weinberger | April 18, 2004 11:17 AM
I believe it was Velveteen Rabbi who brought up Islamicate, in the course of discussing how religion blogs could lead to people talking cross faiths. Not so much ecumenical, in the traditional sense of a priest, a rabbi, and an imam sitting around a conference table, but more in the spirit of daily practice and belief revealed to each other through blogrolls.
That was best-case scenario. We also talked about the potential for blogs to unify various faith groups in hatred of one common "enemy." The vitriol Catholics, Jews, and Protestans heap on Islam in the comments section of Little Green Footballs was an example.
Question was, which is a more powerful trend. I hope it's Velveteen Rabbi adding Islamicate to her blogroll and vice versa, but is that just wishful thinking?
Posted by: Jeff Sharlet | April 19, 2004 05:53 AM
Wow, I can't believe we were the subject of the lecture. I now have to ask why did our names come up? I know it's egoistic, but I am an american after all.
Posted by: Fr. Shane Tharp | April 19, 2004 07:14 PM
I just finished reading an article in the most recent Atlantic, where it talked about optimism in political candidates as being reflective of the optimism in American society. Therefore, I have to say the cross-religious dialogue is the natural progression.
A more substantial argument, I think, revolves around the nature of the internet. While LGF might be able to bring people together around hate, it's also a community of like-minded people. The internet to me has always been about the marketplace of ideas, and finding new ways to challenge oneself. I enjoy the Velveteen Rabbi because I think she posts well about what it means to be religious, irrespective of religion. However, there is also then a fruitful tension between the universal and the particular when trying to understand the specific tradition.
The follow observation may be due to my limited knowledge of religion blogs, but I find most are interested in sharing their view of the world and getting feedback. Oftentimes it's like-minded people, but because of the nature of religious thought, there is occasionally discussion and argumentation as well.
Posted by: islamoyankee | April 20, 2004 09:43 PM