Philip Kennicott of the Washington Post writes about what the images of torture mean to the world and mean about us.
Look at these images closely and you realize that they can't just be the random accidents of war, or the strange, inexplicable perversity of a few bad seeds. First of all, they exist. Soldiers who allow themselves to be photographed humiliating prisoners clearly don't believe this behavior is unpalatable. Second, the soldiers didn't just reach into a grab bag of things they thought would humiliate young Iraqi men. They chose sexual humiliation, which may recall to outsiders the rape scandal at the Air Force Academy, Tailhook and past killings of gay sailors and soldiers.
Is it an accident that these images feel so very much like the kind of home made porn that is traded every day on the Internet? That they capture exactly the quality and feel of the casual sexual decadence that so much of the world deplores in us?
As Kennicott says of the photo of the hooded figure on the electric crucifix: "This is now the image of the war."
Posted
by D. Weinberger at May 5, 2004 07:18 AM
Comments
Relax, it's all in your head. --Marquis de Sade
Posted by: bw | May 5, 2004 08:22 AM
On second thought--this is a deliberate pre-meditated set up for pay back for the 4 mutilated Americans fiasco, because we lost the battle of Fallujah. Heh? How's that? Now I'm starting to think like a Republican.
Posted by: bw | May 5, 2004 08:25 AM