Joho the Blog
|
|
|
June 04, 2004
In response to Jeneane's observation that I've been slighting women, and at the risk of being slightly obsessive, here's a list of every mention I've made of a blog since May 1. 1 Wireless blog starts - all men
What this list tells me is that in the period covered, not only aren't there many women bloggers, there aren't many substantial discussions of blogs at all: I only responded substantially to a single blog, lightly disagreeing with David Batstone at Worthwhile. It seems I wasn't very engaged in the blogosphere. In fact, listing the blog-mentions doesn't accurately represent what I've been blogging about, another sign of disengagement from the blogosphere. I wrote a whole bunch of entries celbrating gay marriage, a bigger bunch of entries about various aspects of the Abu Ghraib horrors, many entries on political issues (including assorted snipes at the current administration), scattered entries about spam remedies, a handful of semi-nerdy tech entries, and a couple of days of blogging from a political conference. By a rough count, about 27 of the 88 entries in this period were responses to items in the mainstream media. While that isn't so many more than the 21 blog mentions, the responses to mainstream items tended to be longer and far more substantial. In short, for the past few weeks I've been in "conversation" with the mainstream media much more than with other bloggers. But, why the gender imbalance? And, for that matter, why the racial imbalance? The answer has to be complex, like asking why I have so few African-American friends: Well, in part it's because my neighborhood is too white and the conferences I hang out tend to be too white (for which there are complex reasons), and in part it's because I've been complacent, and there's undoubtedly an element of unconscious racism in it. Likewise, women have been under-represented in Joho for reasons just as complex. What to do about it? Establish a quota? Nah, no one is suggesting that. But it seems to me that intelligent people — by which I mean everyone — constantly and continuously struggle against the limits of their experience, knowledge, interests, and sympathies. As a species, we're curious. We want to know what we don't know. We want to experience life as others experience it. That's why we talk and fall in love. We do this naturally and easily when the world engages us in ways we hadn't expected. But there is a tyrannical aspect to our interests as well. We have to remind ourselves that not just our knowledge but our interests themselves are limited. The first step is to recognize ways our interests have unwittingly ensnared us. That's why I appreciate Jeneane's observation and the comments that followed. I think my response can only be in terms of awareness and support. Posted
by D. Weinberger at June 4, 2004 09:14 AM
TrackBackListed below are links to weblogs that reference Tally man:
» Friday Summary from AKMA’s Random Thoughts Tracked on June 5, 2004 05:26 PM |
Comments
I know of alot of females that are doing great with their blogs, and I linked to alot of them from my blog, so I hope this makes Jeneane feel better when you tell her, D.
Posted by: Rockchild | June 4, 2004 10:35 AM
Hey! Tally Man rhymes with Taliban! I'm thinking there's a good Afghan/Calypso song in there trying to get out.
Posted by: fp | June 4, 2004 03:17 PM
I have a developing theory (for which, coincidentally, you, David, are like a test case), which is basically that many individuals will need multiple, significantly different, "places" to blog in order to exercise more of the many the different facets of their voices.
It's not that an individual could never do it all on one blog. It's just that each blog, whatever its potential, develops boundaries / limits in what it's "about". It tends to have and inspire a certain set of tones.
Anyway, part of the issue may be the "place" of JOHO the blog, and its habits / boundaries / limits that also happen to be part of how we recognize it's JOHO.
Maybe you'd benefit from a very different place to blog, where that place in itself, specifically by being really different, is "about" different kinds of connections.
Posted by: Jay Fienberg | June 4, 2004 03:30 PM
David:
Hilary Clinton is an important player in the Democratic party (just look how hard Morris is trying to bring her down), yet you never mention her.
The "echo chamber" is working at full tilt enabling sexist roles.
The blogosphere is dominated by WMBs.
Posted by: Ricky M | June 4, 2004 04:15 PM