Joho the Blog
|
|
|
July 08, 2004
CyberJournalilst.net is keeping track of which bloggers were credentialed for the Democratic Convention. So far, we do seem to be a homogenous lot — I believe we're all likely to vote for Kerry, but with varying degrees of enthusiasm. Cyberjournalists asks, if the media are not credentialed according to their beliefs, why are bloggers? But is that the case? I've heard that 35 bloggers were credentialed. Do we know of any unfriendlies (so to speak) who were turned down? Mike Lidell, in an article in the Washington Post article, does not list viewpoint as a criterion:
Since we are unlikely to get a list of the 25 bloggers who were turned down, I don't feel I can have an opinion about the possible vetting of bloggers by viewpoint until we see a longer list of who was accepted. Of course I'm bothered by the skew towards the A-List. How great would it be for bloggers with smaller readerships to function as hometown reporters of a sort? I understand the convention planners thinking that they can't just let anyone in who has set up a blog somewhere. But are we at the point yet? Yo, credentialing committe, how about some transparency about the criteria? How about blogging about it? In any case, the credentialing process is further evidence that blogging is forming a continuum, filling in the gap between professional journalists and people writing letters home. Inevitably, the Big Time media pay too much attention to the side of the spectrum where bloggers are like journalists and columnists without portfolio, missing the vast bulk of the blogosphere where blogs are forming a new network of thought, conversation, identity and community. Jeez, I could have sworn that I blogged a whole bunch more after that original posting, appending it here, including more from Jay Rosen and Dave Winer's community blog for people attending. But now it's gone. What the hell happened to it? Or am I just dreaming it? Anyway, here's more from Jay. Search for "Schnure" on his page to see the DNC's response to the question of whether they vetted bloggers according to their political slant. Posted
by D. Weinberger at July 8, 2004 08:31 AM
TrackBackListed below are links to weblogs that reference Who gets to go:
» Convention Coverage is a Failed Regime and Bloggers Have Their Credentials from PressThink Tracked on July 8, 2004 11:22 AM
» Bloggers to the DNC from MartiniPundit Tracked on July 8, 2004 02:26 PM
» DNC Press Credentials from James Landrith - Taking The Gloves Off Tracked on July 11, 2004 11:39 PM |
Comments
One reason I never even thought to apply for credentials to the DNC is that I can't possibly spare the vacation time to attend it. I suspect that a lot of other non-A-listers are in the same situation.
Posted by: Seth Gordon | July 8, 2004 01:43 PM
Somewhat similar to the reason I don't try to attend any conferences on blogging. Not a vacation time issue in my case, but the fact that Communique is all I do, it's not making me much money, and so I can't afford to do anything but, well, stay in Portland and just do my hobbyist journalism instead.
Posted by: The One True b!X | July 8, 2004 07:18 PM
I got de-credentialed. Not sure if it was random or not. I was a DNC delegate in '96, but my blog is about opening ANWR, so that might have been what got me cut.
Posted by: Clay Butcher | July 9, 2004 08:17 PM
See you there, my Brookline neighbor, I'll be in the convention based on my KerryCore fundraising. I guess I fit your bill as a "smaller site for the hometown".
Of course, I won't be blogging. I'll be going home, thinking things over, and writing essays, not blog posts...
Jon
Posted by: Jon Garfunkel | July 14, 2004 12:39 AM