Joho the Blog
An Entry from the Archives

« Dave's Convention aggregator || Back to Blog | Googlenym »

July 24, 2004

What the media don't understand about blogging

I want to try to answer better a question I got asked by Larry Magid who's putting together a 30 second piece for CBS Radio: What don't the media understand about blogging?

To the print and broadcast media, bloggers usually look like little, vanity-press versions of the mass media. That's because the media focus on the A-List. After all, the A-Listers are the ones who have succeeded in the mass media's terms...

...continued at Boston.com

Posted by D. Weinberger at July 24, 2004 10:47 AM


Comments

Hmm ...

"The focus on the popular magazine writer misses writing as a social phenomenon. Letters are our persistent selves in paperspace; ..."

I suppose.

Are you basically going down the path of: Blogging, like "writing" is a word used to mean all of journalism, chat, diary (many, few, one). Thinking of it only as journalism/many misses the aspect of chat/few or diary/one.

But note I'd say a part of this confusion comes from some A-list'ers claiming the chat/diary writers are somehow a challenge to journalism.

Posted by: Seth Finkelstein | July 24, 2004 11:28 AM


Very good point - many many bloggers are quite successful - and effective - for and with their nano-audiences

Posted by: Jon | July 24, 2004 11:57 AM


Seth, I do mean that asking what bloggers write about is like asking what people who use paper write about.

And I do think that the growth of blogging complements/challenges journalism. Blogging is one more force loosening modern journalism's embrace of objectivity as a goal; clearly, New Journalism came before blogging.

Posted by: David Weinberger | July 24, 2004 05:18 PM


Heh, "We're not worthy...", well, shit, maybe again... Boston, Boston, Boston...

Posted by: bw | July 24, 2004 09:26 PM


OK, just making sure I understood what you were saying (and I agree that "what's blogging?" == "what's writing?")

However, to play devil's advocate for a bit, the growth of amateur pundits might just very well drive professional journalists to grip tighter to "objectivity", as a means of marketing a product differentiation.

Posted by: Seth Finkelstein | July 25, 2004 10:53 AM


Seth, good point and I'd be shocked if that didn't happen, even as the reins are also loosened.

Posted by: David Weinberger | July 25, 2004 12:23 PM


What the media doesn't understand
about blogging... is that it does
not fit into a 30-second radio report.
I've already taken several minutes
to mull over this Seth-David exchange and to
phrase my response. I get cranky when
I have to listen to 30-second radio
reports becuase they are as informative
as bumper stickers.

Posted by: Jo Ann | July 26, 2004 12:27 AM


Post a comment

Guidelines for Commenting

Basically, you can say what you want. (Click here for the fine print.)

If you haven't left a comment here before, your comment may be put into a queue for me to approve. Sorry for the delay. Blame the damn spammers.