Joho the Blog
An Entry from the Archives

« Hiawatha on Apple scum || Back to Blog | [etech] Why I'm at etech »

March 15, 2005

Bogus Contest:: Tag...Not just for geeks any more

Bob Filipczak was browsing AdCritic.ccom and came across a couple of commercials for a body spray for men called Tag. I don't subscribe to AdCritic ($100/yr), but here's the stub of an article from AdWeek:

* The budget was not disclosed, but sources said initial ad spending would be at least $50 million.

* The campaign employs broad humor and sexual innuendo in an effort to appeal to teens and young adult males, the key target market for the product.

* Commercial scenarios include advances from the mother of a prospective date and reactions to the product's scent in public venues including a drugstore and a sports arena.

AdWeek also requires a subscription. As does Marketing magazine. Jeez, these marketing folks make it hard to get any stinking information about products!

At least Time lets you read an article about it.

Anyway, Bob suggests a tag line:

Tag: Makes Geeks Tolerable.

Bogus Contest: Tag lines for Tag.

My contribution:

Tag: Removes the Stink of Hierarchy...From Your Bottom Up

[Technorati tags: tags marketing]

Posted by D. Weinberger at March 15, 2005 12:38 AM


Comments

This actually makes sense to me. We all want to squirt things on each other so we can recognize folks and recall the experiences we shared. Squirting on each other in public is frowned upon, hence we squirt on ourselves with products like you describe.

I squirt on virtual things (URLs), and I call this 'making them delicious'. When there's people around me and they say "here's a neat page" I reply "make it delicious". Leave a little secretion from yourself and I'll sniff it out later.

Quote from Salon article on tagging:

"It's a very simple concept, and 43 Things is a very simple site, but tagging as it is used here and at some of the Web's most interesting and lively new sites is launching a revolution of self-organization on the Internet. You could call it the latest twist in the ongoing evolution of social networking software(1). Except there's a difference: On social networking sites like Orkut or Friendster, people join, and then declare their alliances to each other explicitly. *On sites that employ tagging, the networks emerge, implicitly, out of the shared interests of users. Order isn't proclaimed, it just happens.*[my emphasis]"

http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2005/02/08/tagging/

(1) I think this understates the case: this is like calling AOL's switch from per-hour to unlimited monthly billing a 'twist'. imho, it's a paradigm shift, away from conversation, towards stigmergy.

It might be interesting to equate conversation in the stigmergic world to marketing in the current (conversational) world. Per the clue train, markets become conversations, but in a stigmergic world, all conversations are marketing, and they all say "Play tag with me".

Hmmm, perhaps a future soft drink will feature taggants that encode your DNA enabling you to piss on real world objects and thus tag them. Little 'I was here' signs. I understand Japanese culture allows men to piss in public.

So, it's 2008 and a couple is walking in the city, seeking something to eat, and one says "Wow, the stench of urine around the entranceway is really powerful! It must be a great restaurant!"

Ok, I'll stop here.

Posted by: Mike | March 15, 2005 03:26 AM


Oh how silly, the soft drink would encode your URL, not your DNA.

Thanks.

Posted by: Mike | March 15, 2005 03:30 AM


Tag: You're it.

Posted by: Joseph Lindsay | March 15, 2005 01:05 PM


Post a comment

Guidelines for Commenting

Basically, you can say what you want. (Click here for the fine print.)

If you haven't left a comment here before, your comment may be put into a queue for me to approve. Sorry for the delay. Blame the damn spammers.