Joho the Blog
|
|
|
March 21, 2005
What will computing be like in 5 years? Jayshree Ullal (Cisco): There are no secure perimeters. We need to be much more real-world. It's going to be based on defining trust domains — the school you're from, the location you're from — which will be different than now when everything is separtae, e.g., you anti-virus, your firewall, etc. Esther: Will we be able to go to an Internet cafe and anonymously log on? Ullal: You shouldn't be allowed to now. We need authentication and feedback mechanisms, etc. [Ack!] John Thompson (Symantec): We should keep the Net environment diverse and learn where the bad parts of town are. Scott Charney (Microsoft): We need both accountability and anonymity, so it should be done on the application layer. I want accountability when on-line banking but anonymity when engaging in political speech. Thompson: We'll be in trusted communities but not only in trusted communities. Bob Frankston: How do we make computers secure without limiting outlandish and outrageous innovation? Steven Levy: How do we do this without losing our civil liberties? [No time for answers.] Thompson: Phishing has gone up exponentially. The question is whether the info that's gathered is going to be used in the near future. Ullal: We need better enforcement and more centralization. Thompson: We can't turn back democracy. [I'm liking him!] [Technorati tag: pcforum05] Posted
by D. Weinberger at March 21, 2005 11:41 AM
|
Comments
does anyone have an opinion about the trusted computing working group, or the trusted platform module? I am trying to determine what the impact of this group/technologies will be ove the next five years.
Posted by: Jason Curtis | March 22, 2005 02:08 AM
I think their can't be a way without them. They will be more and more in use.
Posted by: Daniel Zeitschiften Abo | March 26, 2005 01:52 PM