Joho the Blog
|
|
|
April 05, 2005
3 Quarks Daily wonders if the Internet could influence the selection of the next pope by setting up a wiki where the webosphere could educate itselff about the 117 people who cast their votes in the Sistine Chapel, and then pepper them with opinions. Sounds like a waste of time as an attempt to affect the decision — the process is cloistered on purpose — but a worthwhile exercise in citizen journalism. Besides, do you think maybe as a Jew I kinda lack the standing to be listened to on this particular topic? Now, when it's time to select a new Pope of the Internet, send me a butterfly ballot. (Thanks to Marko Ahtisaari for the link. Joi and Mark Federman also have interesting posts on the Pope and MSM.) [Technorati tag: pope] Posted
by D. Weinberger at April 5, 2005 08:21 AM
|
Comments
I was on the plane. The british hostess wanted to ask me if I was very sad for the pope's death. Because I'm Italian.
Rome, and Italy, are more the home of the pope than anything else in the eyes of the world. The concept of the pope as we have known it until recently, has been invented by the Roman emperor Constantin in the IV century. And since then it has evolved as a mix of Roman aristocracy and global authority.
Lately, it became more of a global authority.
Romans still feel like it is their bishop, but the pope now lives much more in a world perspective. Romans think that the next pope could be an Italian. I don't know if they are right. If they are it means that the Roman aristocracy legacy is still there: but it would seem a step backwards in the eyes of the world. Romans should globalize their legacy to get the benefit of what's happening.
If the new pope will be, let's say, from Brazil, it will mean much more. It will mean that the church is still fighting against American style consumism, which was were Woityla lost his battle. But it will also mean that the church is global. And this is much more important in political terms.
A global system of moral authorities is something that is more and more needed. Values cannot be only left to the relativity of cultures. There must be a global debate about what the people of the world wants to be Good and Bad. If not, it will be a president of the United States the one who says where is Evil. That would be moral power, but not moral authority.
Posted by: Luca De Biase | April 5, 2005 10:45 PM