Joho the Blog
An Entry from the Archives

« [s2n] Yochai Benkler || Back to Blog | [s2n] Machinima »

April 08, 2005

[s2f] New opportunities

David Dixon tells how in 2001 he publicized an MP3 that performed a Beatles track in the style of Metallica. He did it without permission of the band that did it. Sony sent him a cease and desist letter. Lars of Metallica is actually on the right side in ths case, trying to get Sony to drop its stupid, bullying lawsuit. Sony is not pursuing the suit, although they also haven't dropped it.

Wendy Seltzer of the EFF says that this is a good example of chillling effects. The new means of distribution bring small-town bands under the gaze of big corporate property holders.

Naomi Novik is a fanfiction writer. She says she hasn't received any cease and desist orders. She talks about "fan vids": Clips from favorite shown over music tracks. "We're flying under the radar," she says. "The better the work is, the more likely it is to be hidden and hard to found" because "the people who write the better things are more aware" of the risks. The better writers, she says, post a few things publicly to draw people in, but keep the best hidden. She's trying to create a modified Creative Commons license that let people read a work and use it in fan fiction, while protecting the author from later getting sued by a fan who claims the author stole the idea from her.

Wendy: "I'm really distrubed to hear that we have fewer rights when we're dealing with richer media than when dealing with text."

Should the owner be allowed to control who gets to use or remix? Naomi says if you let someone, you have to let anyone. Walter McDonough of the Future of Music says that if an objectionable group were to do that to music made by one of his clients, he'd go ballistic.

[They've delayed lunch by an hour, to 2 o'clock, and I'm losing focus. Sorry.] [Technorati tag: s2n]

Posted by D. Weinberger at April 8, 2005 01:47 PM


Comments

Re Naomi's attempts to create the alternative Creative Commons license - She's actually trying to create a way that professional authors (which she also is) can a)explicitly authorize fanfiction to be created as derivatives of their works and b)be allowed *themselves* to read that fanfiction without risking being sued by their own fans if they should develop parallel themes in their own work.

Essentially that's because several authors have actually had that problem - famously Marion Zimmer Bradley. This lead to lawyers advising published authors either to explicitly allow fanfic but also explicitly never read it, or to explicitly disapprove of fanfic altogether (and still explicitly never read it), cutting the original authors off from all the fun creativity and community being born because of their original work. Since many authors are actually quite happy to be fanficced, and would love to read the resulting stories, a license that could acknowledge a certain primary right to all stories created in the "sandbox" of the original author's original works would be an excellent thing.

Posted by: Erica | April 8, 2005 11:10 PM


Er, clarification - not that the original author should have primary right to all stories created in their universe, but to all stories created BY THEM in their own universe. Some acknowledgment that an original writer's ideas my be related to or similar to those of fanfic writers and that the original writer shouldn't have to change their plans for their writing because of that.

Posted by: Erica | April 8, 2005 11:16 PM


Post a comment

Guidelines for Commenting

Basically, you can say what you want. (Click here for the fine print.)

If you haven't left a comment here before, your comment may be put into a queue for me to approve. Sorry for the delay. Blame the damn spammers.