Joho the Blog
An Entry from the Archives

« Blogs as a reason not to hire (= Pre-fired for blogging) || Back to Blog | The Onion redux? »

July 11, 2005

Kiss your assrove goodbye

If Newsweek's report is right, Karl Rove is about to be frog-marched — um, liberty-marched — out of the White House. In fact, possibly he will not pass Go and will go straight to jail. This is from Salon:

Rove never said publicly that he had nothing to do with leaking Valerie Plame's identity to the press, but he sure managed to give people that impression. When CNN asked him about the Plame case last summer, Rove said: "I didn't know her name. I didn't leak her name."

Maybe that was technically correct, but it's now clear that it was something less than the whole truth. As Newsweek is reporting, Karl Rove may not have referred to Plame by name when he spoke with Time's Matthew Cooper on July 11, 2003. But the email messages Time has turned over to special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald show that, in a phone call with Cooper that day, Rove tried to discredit Joseph Wilson's conclusion that Iraq hadn't tried to buy uranium from Niger by claiming that Wilson had been assigned to look into the Iraq-Niger connection not by the vice president or by the director of the CIA but by Wilson's wife. And Wilson's wife, Rove told Cooper, was a CIA analyst working on WMD issues.

Tim Grieve at Salon thinks this "no-name defense" may protect Rove from perjury charges. But it's still a crime to rat out a covert CIA agent. Well, what's one traitorous act when you're playing hardball, eh Karl? [Technorati tags: KarlRove plame politics]

Posted by D. Weinberger at July 11, 2005 09:16 AM


TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Kiss your assrove goodbye:

» Blogging for Karl from Age Ventures
He needs a legal defense fund ... [Read More]

Tracked on July 11, 2005 02:51 PM

Comments

I thought these folks didn't eat their young?

Posted by: Branko Collin | July 11, 2005 11:09 AM


Sterling Newberry points out that Rove and the CIA source he referred reporters to could be charged with conspiracy, as well.

Posted by: Seth Gordon | July 11, 2005 11:28 AM


They couldn't get him on perjury unless he was under oath when he said it. I don't think it's a crime to lie to reporters. They're the ones responsible for checking the facts. Even if he was under oath, he could weasel out of it.
No, the big question now is proving the scumbag knew exactly what he was doing. That and how long it will take Bush to issue a pardon.

Posted by: James Richards | July 11, 2005 12:23 PM


'Sounds like the definition of 'is' all over again. Rove is guilty of treason and should be prosecuted.

Posted by: Tim | July 12, 2005 12:00 AM


Post a comment

Guidelines for Commenting

Basically, you can say what you want. (Click here for the fine print.)

If you haven't left a comment here before, your comment may be put into a queue for me to approve. Sorry for the delay. Blame the damn spammers.