Joho the Blog
An Entry from the Archives

« Croatia's homosexuals go public || Back to Blog | Burmese filtering »

October 12, 2005

Bradner on Internet wire-tapping

Scott looks at the FCC's decision about how to enforce wiretapping access rules on the Internet. Snippet:

The logic that the FCC uses is often rather tortured. For example, it says that a VoIP provider that uses gateways to direct calls to and from the public switched telephone network (PSTN) fits the switching requirement because it "must necessarilyuse a router or other server to do so." Of course, this condition is true of all services offered over the Internet, not just interconnected VoIP. So where should the boundary be?

The Thou Shalt Wiretap mandate (the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, or CALEA) is dead serious and potentially hugely chilling of innovation, since it may head us towards only allowing "authorized" applications on the Net. We need to be taking this boneheaded step towards totalitarianism — in the name of homeland security, of course — quite seriously. [Tags: DigitalRights calea ScottBradner voip fcc]

Posted by D. Weinberger at October 12, 2005 06:37 AM

Comments

The "echelon" system was always there. Drapa running voip on an atm backbone. They (dod/dhs) have just moved their zone from milatary application to a civilian arena.

Posted by: /pd | October 12, 2005 07:31 AM

Somebody really needs to dig into how Skype/eBay are going to handle the FCC wiretap requirement. The Skype-POTS interconnect might not be too hard, but the Encrypted P2P PC-PC calls?

Posted by: Julian Bond | October 12, 2005 08:13 AM

Post a comment

Guidelines for Commenting

Basically, you can say what you want. (Click here for the fine print.)

If you haven't left a comment here before, your comment may be put into a queue for me to approve. Sorry for the delay. Blame the damn spammers.