Joho the Blog
An Entry from the Archives

« Fleishman interviews Varsavsky on Fon: It's all about the telefons || Back to Blog | From analog to digital computers »

February 14, 2006

[berkman] Sunlight Foundation

A group from the Sunlight are giving a Tuesday lunchtime talk at the Berkman center. The group here today includes Micah Sifry, Andrew Rasiej, Ellen Miller, and Michael Klein. [As always, what follows is an inaccurate sketch. I make no claim of completeness.)

The Sunlight Foundation aims at bring transparency and accountability to Congress. The name comes from the 1913 Brandeis quotation: "Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants; electric light the most efficient policeman." "Lawmakers will continue to do what they do," Ellen says, "so long as they can get away with it." The Foundation's goal is "real transparency about the quid pro quo": Who is giving them money? Who are they meeting with? What are they inserting into bills? Then, this information has to be put into shareable format (xml, APIs).

For this, they need citizens to do some investigation — "distributive journalism."

Congress still files bunches of disclosure information on paper. The Foundation is working with the Center for Responsive Politics on digitizing this. Ellen shows screen captures of how the government currently makes information available online: Endless lists of cryptically named files, many of which lead to single PDFs of paper forms.

Sunlight's plan: Collect new information, digitize the old, and invest in connecting the records. Find ways to involve citizens as muckrakers and reporters. Get the information out of DC and into the blogs, etc., where people are lookng for it. And galvanize a national campaign.

Micah says they'd like to have a tool to enable any blogger or journalist to put a box on any page that talks about a Congressperson. Maybe the box lists their top five donors and links to a page with all the info.

kjQ: (Bill McGeveran) Doesn't this pose a privacy threat to individual donors who have given a small amount of money to a cause that perhaps his neighbors don't like? How can we have the maximum benefit of sunlight but also not chill a private person who wants to donate $300 to some cause?
A: (Mike) That information is already there. It's already available.

A: (Ellen) If you give less than $200, it's not recorded.A: (Mike) There might be some small chilling effect, but the corrosive effect of not having sunlight is an overwhelmingly bad thing.

Q: (Amanda Michel) They key audience for Sunlight are the researchers and activists. They need timely data. Aggregating data and making it available to researchers would be a tremendous service.
A: (Mike) First the data has to be there. We'll also provide tools for using the data.

Q: (irc) Any support from Congress?
A: (Andrew Rasiej) No. Not publicly.
A: (Mike) Schwarzenegger is going to make his calendar public. And John McCain is in favor of more disclosure.

Q: How can they say no?
A: (Ellen) They say that if they post their calendars, they would be reluctant to meet with groups outside of the mainstream.
A: (Andrew) They just can't fathom it. "They're so addicted to topdown control..."

Q: (Dan Gillmor) Are there any states or municipalities that have gone part of the way that you could use as a test bed?
A: (Ellen) We're working on it.

A: (Micah) It's a fertile time for doing this.

Q: I ran a campaign for the mayor of Portland. To draw off votes from another candidate, we ran a competing candidate. With full sunlight, we couldn't have done that.

Q: Will there be an opportunity for candidates to respond?
A: (Mike) They have the world and the platform to respond. And we're just making the data available.
A: (Ellen) We're doing a blog that will use the data and people will be able to respond there.

Q: (me) Are you putting forward a Sunlight Pledge of some sort that candidates can take?
A: We're working on it. (Dan Gillmor adds: Put the draft up on your site and your readers will write it for you.)

Q: (me) Are you working on standardized data formats?
A: Yes. It's premature to talk about it. We're talking with people.
A: (Andrew) The data is in silos and the owners of it don't like the idea that their data might be put into the public.

(This could be an important service on which some killer public service apps can - and I hope will - be built.) [Tags: politics sunlight+foundation disclosure disclosure andrew+rasiej micah+sifry michael+klein ellen+miller congress]

Posted by D. Weinberger at February 14, 2006 03:13 PM


Comments

This quote "They say that if they post their calendars, they would be reluctant to meet with groups outside of the mainstream." really interested in me.

How low would it go? Every staffers meeting? Because by that level I know and experienced having meetings with people who were not from the district but had asked for a meeting. Granted my input for the office was minor, but if you extended it to that level I could see even staffers turning down meetings, because they wouldn't want group X seen associating with the office.

I am not saying it's a bad idea, but it's a tough question to handle. I could see meeting with constituents being turned down because they don't want to be seen supporting a cause when a staffer was being polite to meet with the folks because they were from Home, even if the boss wouldn't meet with them.

I agree with the general idea of bringing light to how Congress works, I think most people would be shocked at the hours Members and staff put in on a daily basis.

Posted by: Thomas | February 14, 2006 06:39 PM


This (http://www.minutesnmotion.com/) had early promise, but I don't think it's gone anywhere much .. probably because the administration for which it would enable public surveillance couldn't find it in their budgets to offer the degree of transparency it may have enabled.

Two / three years ago MinutesnMotion's targeted use was for municipal, county and state governments .. it looks to me like it was re-focused on smaller civic governments in order to get some clients.

Posted by: Jon Husband | February 15, 2006 02:10 AM


Very well organized site. I particularly liked the resources section.
Will use it to plan my next trip to NWT. See you soon.

Posted by: pharmacy | February 15, 2006 04:19 AM


I Am a Registerd Nurse and Michigan Taxpayer. ALso a Retired General Motors Salary employee. Have proff of HUGE conspiracy/cover-up that transcends ALL Levels of OUR legal system. Have documentation to PROVE ALL I share with YOU. Dismissed by OSHA, HHS, Civil Rights, Gov. Granholm, Mike Cox, US Dept. of Labor (Patrick Hyde) NO ONE WILL TELL THE TRUTH. IT begins with the OUTSOURCING of the GM Medical & Insurance dept. in 1996. I oriented over Registered Nurses- (Contract emp. NOT trained in the specific expertise needed to do job of NURSE in 24-7 Medical.) GM Management knows of Breach but cover-up is rampant. PLEASE Call me @ 989-790-7623 if YOU have Integrity and will tell the American people the TRUE STORY. WE want a congressional hearing!! TRUTH IS THE ONLY DEFENSE AGAINST LIBEL AND SLANDER.
I WILL NOT BE SILENT.
GAIL DECAIRE RN- THE LAST GM NURSE (GENERAL MOTORS)

Posted by: Gail DeCaire RN | April 27, 2006 10:08 AM


I am a Registered Nurse and Michigan taxpayer. Have TRUE story of Conspiracy/Cover-up that transcends ALL levels of OUR government and legal system. A retired General Motors Salary employee I have the documentants regarding the OUTSOURCING of the GM Medical. NO LEGAL record keeping is being done. The entire GM/UAw CONTRACT IS A farce. pLEASE CALL ME ASAP IF YOU HAVE INTEGRITY AND WILL TELL THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THE TRUE STORY. 989-790-7623 OR 989-798-2181
GAIL DECAIRE RN- THE LAST GM NURSE (GENERAL MOTORS)

Posted by: Gail DeCaire RN | April 29, 2006 08:45 AM


I am a Registered Nurse and Michigan taxpayer. Have TRUE story of Conspiracy/Cover-up that transcends ALL levels of OUR government and legal system. A retired General Motors Salary employee I have the documentants regarding the OUTSOURCING of the GM Medical. NO LEGAL record keeping is being done. The entire GM/UAw CONTRACT IS A farce. pLEASE CALL ME ASAP IF YOU HAVE INTEGRITY AND WILL TELL THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THE TRUE STORY. 989-790-7623 OR 989-798-2181
GAIL DECAIRE RN- THE LAST GM NURSE (GENERAL MOTORS)

Posted by: Gail DeCaire RN | April 29, 2006 08:46 AM


Can you please tell me if you are considered a U.S. Citizen eligible for the presidency if you were born outside of the United States of a U.S. citizen mother and an Indonesian father.

Posted by: Jacqueline Meyer | January 28, 2007 07:16 PM


Post a comment

Guidelines for Commenting

Basically, you can say what you want. (Click here for the fine print.)

If you haven't left a comment here before, your comment may be put into a queue for me to approve. Sorry for the delay. Blame the damn spammers.