Joho the Blog
|
|
|
January 02, 2006
An illustration that you can never tell how people are going to want to classify things:
In Ernst Posner, Archives in the Ancient World (The Society of American Archivisits: Chicago, 1972) p. 5 [Tags: EverythingIsMiscellaneous taxonomy crocodiles egypt] Posted
by D. Weinberger at January 2, 2006 01:04 PM
|
Comments
Trees vs. piles of leaves
The comparison betwen trees vs. piles of leaves reminds me a lot of the opening of "A Thousand Plateaus" and the comparison between aborescent & rhizomatic structures.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0816614024/qid=1136253562/002-4318674-8288868
Aborescent = hierarchical, tree-like structure.
Rhizome = underground, laterally-connected, assemblage.
Deleuze & Guattari lace their writing with poisonous amounts of jargon but the underlying metaphor is very similar.
The main difference between a rhizome and a pile of leaves is that a rhizome still has connections between its component parts.
Posted by: Matt Moore | January 2, 2006 09:03 PM
Matt, Thanks. I've tried many times to read D & G, to no avail. I can't even understand the books that explain D & G. Sigh.
Yes, the comparison seems apt. With leaves, the connections grow rapidly, so they become rhizomal right away.
Posted by: David Weinberger
|
January 2, 2006 10:09 PM
You must be a fan of MASH, and especially the filing system of corporal Radar O'Reilly.
Posted by: Branko Collin | January 3, 2006 08:56 AM