Joho the Blog
An Entry from the Archives

« Whois? We are. || Back to Blog | This week at the Berkman Center »

October 25, 2007

Finding what we can't spell

I went to look up Plumpy'nut - a peanut-butter based nutritional compound important where people are starving - at Wikipedia, but I thought it was spelled "plumpinut." The misspelling leads you to a Wikipedia dead end page. I thought about creating a "plumpinut" entry that does nothing but point to the Plumpy'nut entry. But somehow I don't think Wikipedia wants to have entries that are misspellings.

Anyone know the right way help people find the entries of terms they don't know how to spell? [Tags: wikipedia ]


Plumpy'nut, which essentially is a recipe, is patented. If you want to mix up peanuts 'n' stuff, you may be violating the law. Christine Gorman, at the Harvard Nieman Center, has a blog on the patenting of peanut butter + mixins.

Posted by D. Weinberger at October 25, 2007 02:01 PM


Comments

This is easy to fix. You simply create the page with two lines of content. On the first line, put "#REDIRECT [[Plumpy'nut]]", and on the second line put "{{R from misspelling}}". The first line turns the page into a redirect to the page you then link, and the second is a template which categorizes the redirect as a redirect from a misspelling. If you need any more help using Wikipedia, a good resource is the Help desk. I've fixed the page in question, but now you know how to do it in the future. :)

Posted by: Nihiltres | October 25, 2007 02:15 PM


@Nihiltres, I think Mr. Weinberger was wondering if the REDIRECT is the correct way to deal with a misspelling. That is, do we want multiple pages with wrong spellings in the Wikipedia. I believe that if it is a "common" misspelling, then a REDIRECT is acceptable. Of course, Google is a good way to measure "common"ness of misspellings; but in this case, a Google search for 'plumpinut' brings up the recently created Wikipedia REDIRECT as result #2 and this blog as result #6!

Posted by: Devan | October 25, 2007 02:30 PM


I didn't know about the redirect. Thanks!

And I'm shocked at how quickly Google is indexing blogs.

Posted by: David Weinberger | October 25, 2007 03:23 PM


@Devan: It's a good thing to have common misspellings, alternate wordings, et cetera, in general (it helps people find what they're looking for, and we can categorize the redirects as such), but that it shows up on Google that way is interesting, especially because Wikipedia returns the title as "Plumpy'nut - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" on the actual page - Google is doing something frankly odd in displaying the title that way. I think I might ask about it, because it obviously shouldn't do that for typographical errors and misspellings or miscapitalizations.

Posted by: Nihiltres | October 25, 2007 05:30 PM


Google indexes the page with the word 'plumpinut', but not the page which that one redirects to.

But I'm intrigued - searching on 'plumpinut' is out of the question? Do you go right to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/? Or do you have a toolbar lookup or other shortcut?

Posted by: esseffen | October 26, 2007 07:37 PM


Post a comment

Guidelines for Commenting

Basically, you can say what you want. (Click here for the fine print.)

If you haven't left a comment here before, your comment may be put into a queue for me to approve. Sorry for the delay. Blame the damn spammers.