Joho the Blog
|
|
|
March 07, 2006
This session is about looking ahead. Micah Sifry starts with advice for organizers: Find the connectors among all those speaking. Go to the watering holes where people already are rather than expecting them to come to you. Online social networks that are tuned to work on politics may be the next big thing. Eli Pariser of MoveOn.org warns that darkness may be over the horizon. There is a threat to our medium: We need to preserve Net neutrality, the lack of gatekeepers and the low barrier to entry. The threat is that cable companies and ISPs are trying to change the fundamental rules of the Internet. This should be an issue of personal concern to everyone at this conference. "Intellligence at the edge rather than control in the center is the fundamental design principle of the Internet," said Vint Cerf, Eli says. There are two reasons for hope, he says: 1. Google and Amazon et al. are in a clash of the titans against AOL/Time-Warner, etc., so intervention can be effective. 2. This is an issue that people across partisan lines can agree on. He recommends NetFreedomNow.com Valdis Krebs asks how you build networks. Not as part of a campaign effort once every two or four years, he answers. People make real connections by working together on some project. Influence is local; that's where decisions are made. Q: What about "GoodMail" from AOL Micah talks about some tech for building genuinely local networks. All the panelists agree that the strong networks aren't formed for politics but have other interests and centers. Micah, however, thinks that America is a relatively non-political culture. But laterally-connected online groups are changing this because people believe their ideas and contributions matter; by being connected to others, people don't feel so powerless. [Tags: micah+sifry eli+pariser valdis+krebs politics moveon] Posted
by D. Weinberger at March 7, 2006 05:00 PM
|
Comments
The AOL so-called "GoodMail" thing really torques me off. I've had an AOL account for 10 years, stuck with their sorry butts through their hideous growth spurts and service interruptions, crappy content and lousier interface, simply because my AOL email address is like my phone number. It's something that folks closest to me know by heart.
As I see it, I'm already PAYING through the NOSE for AOL to deliver mail to me that I've requested as a MoveOn member. Or as a DemocracyForAmerica, or as a member of any other PAC or non-profit to which I've submitted registration information and my email address so they can email me. Just give me my damned mail, that's all I'm asking. I've paid for it in spades over the last decade; AOL needs to butt out of my requested mail and simply provide service or I'll find some other ISP that will.
And that's where MoveOn is going about this the wrong way with AOL; this is NOT about bulkmail like commercial advertisers that blanket the net with unrequested spam. Every AOL subscriber who is a registered MoveOn member ASKED for MoveOn's emails. For this reason, MoveOn should organize in such a way that every single MoveOn member who's subscribed to AOL threatens to terminate service with AOL. They also need to identify "blue" ISP's that want to do business with activists and court them to supplant AOL. The carrot's right there: deliver the mail we've asked for and you can keep our registered users' business and their eyeballs for your advertising sales. The stick: fail to give us our mail and we're all of us so out of here.
Posted by: RayneToday | March 7, 2006 10:24 PM
Thank you for the NetFreedomNow link, David. Everybody, it links to an easy action page to send emails to the telecom and cable CEOs and Congresscritters.
EFF.org is another great organization - you all have probably heard of it or are members. They have an action item for the AOL email issue.
Posted by: OLinda | March 8, 2006 03:51 PM