Joho the Blog
|
|
|
June 22, 2006
What a cynical way to open an article, dismissing all concerns, on all sides, as mere political maneuvering. Is this reporting? [Tags: media] Dan Rather ought to start a blog faster than a five-legged mule rollin' downhill. Esme Vos, one of the people who just may save the Net, blogs about why the media keeps writing the same damn story about muni wifi. USA Today has a feature that wonders whether Adam Sandler will be accepted in a role where he doesn't play a "moron." "Will the fanboys buy Sandler in a role where he has to deliver dramatic monologues and even tear up a little? They haven't in the past." The article then points to the box office failure of Spanglish and Punch-Drunk Love. Interesting premise. Unfortunately, the accompanying filmography that lists both the "juvenile humor factor" and box office receipts shows pretty much the opposite. Billy Madison (according to the article) gets a 4 out of 4 on the juvenile scale but only made $25.6M. Little Nicky is the other full 4 and it made only $39.5M. Happy Gilmore scored 3 out of 4 and only made $38.8M. Anger Management, 50 First Dates and Big Daddy each got only 2 on the juvenile scale but made $135.6, $120.9, and $163.5 million. Even the "failed" Spanglish, which gets 0 on the moron scale, made $42.7M, which is more than his full moron movies. So, the USA hypothesis is robustly proven, in the sense that the opposite of it is true. Posted
by D. Weinberger at June 22, 2006 09:21 AM
|
Comments
I was watching CNBC the other day and they had a story about Larry Ellison of Oracle.
My impression of the story was that it came across more as an entertainment report with the reporter's opinion of Ellison comming across vs. being a non-biased business report.
We've got to think about and be aware of the media that we are consuming.
Posted by: steve garfield | June 22, 2006 11:13 AM