Joho the Blog
|
|
|
« The Velveteen Rabbi cooks up some latkes || Back to Blog | [leweb] My talk about democracy at Le Web 3 » December 15, 2006
Le Web 3, which I thought was an outstanding event and a very good conference—great for networking and community, with excellent speakers trapped in a traditional conference framework—is now enmeshed in a controversy that confounds me. If two of the three leading presidential candidates came to a US tech conference to talk for twenty minutes each about their Internet policies, it'd be considered a coup. At Le Web, however, some attendees feel cheated and betrayed. In part, perhaps it's because Le Web was a genuinely international conference. I happen to enjoy politics, so I was happy to hear from the French politicians (even one who I thought treated us like pommes de terre de couch). Others obviously don't share my interests, so perhaps it felt to them as if two soccer stars bumped other speakers to promote their books. (But the candidates were talking about Internet policies, so the analogy isn't exact.) Some apparently resent the intrusion of the traditional media. They came in with the candidates, elbowed people aside, and left with the candidates. On the other hand, one of the candidates, and Loic, pushed back on them. Le slap across the media's face. Then there's a personal layer. Loic Lemeur (Disclosure: I count Loic as a friend. Plus Le Web paid my plane and hotel expenses) has blogged in favor of one of the candidates. He was quite gracious to the other candidate, but some have accused Loic of inviting the candidates in order to advance his own career, and perhaps to advance his company's interests. If you see no other value in having the candidates attend, then I suppose personal motivations become the best available explanation. And how could any of us not be tempted by the opportunity to be noticed by possible future presidents? But since the candidates' appearances at the conference seemed to me so obviously a positive, I don't need to resort to Loic's inner motives. None of this has been helped by the post-event conversation, much of it quite angry, and further fueled by an ill-tempered, late-night response from Loic, for which he quickly apologized. Frankly, the swirling path of anger is too exhausting and unpleasant for me to follow. Finally, there's the possiblity that there's simply a cultural divide here, and I'm just not getting something. Perhaps there's a subtext or a history. My own understanding—it may well be deficient but for now it's all I have—leaves me feeling bad that a first-class event is being torn down for what I thought was a net (and Net) positive. [Tags: leweb3 loic_lemeur politics france] Posted
by D. Weinberger at December 15, 2006 10:12 AM
|
Comments
Hi David,
I really enjoyed your speech. This is my first time at leweb and when you went on the stage I heard some guy say..oooo.. this guy is weird. After listening to you I thought "wow!"
Your comparison of media vs bloggers and the fact that traditional media spin content that they want you to here has converted me. Power to the bloggers I say.
Thanks for the light.
regarding the conference there was alot of ass smooching let's face it. I just thought it would of been fair to have a Q and A with Sarkosy..he left has quickly as he came in.
Posted by: webdude | December 15, 2006 04:21 PM
David, I found this a very interesting post, thank you, and it's a good example of the value I find in reading your blog - there's education and insight to be had into how the blog business is evolving. It might even be called "citizen journalism" :-).
Oh, I'd say the "cultural divide" you reference has to do with breaking the illusion that you're part of "conversation", and intruding the reality that you're a product to be sold to the existing political power structure. Bringing in representatives of the power structure breaks the bubble, violates the willing suspension of disbelief. It's like seeing the wires in a flying harness. Of course at some level the audience knows the actor isn't really flying. And we shouldn't make a big deal that the wires show up. But nonetheless, some people find it ruins their ability to enjoy the fiction.
Posted by: Seth Finkelstein | December 15, 2006 11:10 PM
Seth, I take it you are saying that bringing in representatives of the existing power structure breaks the illusion that an important conversation exists that can usefully ignore both representatives and structure. In other words, peprhaps Europe is falling for the American stricture that, "It's not polite to bring up politics in general conversation."
Or, what you really meant was...?
Posted by: johne | December 18, 2006 02:54 PM