Joho the Blog
|
|
|
November 09, 2005
Terry Heaton writes provocatively about the "unbundled newsroom":
This is journalism made fully transparent. (There's much more in Terry's piece than those two snippets, btw.) Terry sees the broadcast news programs as a rebundling of the bundles. I wonder whether the networks are going to be trusted as rebundlers worth listening to; already the editorial function has migrated to the Web to a remarkable degree for many of us. Why should we value the broadcasters' editorial judgment enough to enable them to stay afloat economically? And if the news programs fail, why will the news divisions continue to generate unbundled content? I'm not saying I have an alternative. [Tags: news media TerryHeaton EverythingIsMiscellaneous] Posted
by D. Weinberger at November 9, 2005 11:33 AM
|
Comments
There's a difference between info-saturation and journalism. "Broadcast news" at its best conveys information remarkably like (but not actually) journalism. And it is seldom at its best. To suggest that saturation of available media with bundled journo-packets will be anything better is very optimistic. I think we should leave journalism to the journalists and not confuse them - the journalists - with media producers, or anchor-folks, or vloggers, or bloggers, or bears.
There's more to "news" than immediacy.
Posted by: fp | November 9, 2005 05:06 PM
Is thus, true quite good!!!
Posted by: 手机图片下载 | November 9, 2005 08:50 PM
Thahk you,
It's very intresting :)
Posted by: Nicolette | November 11, 2005 06:37 AM
it was horribly bad
Posted by: sammie dsfh fdsfsdfdf | January 5, 2006 02:45 PM