Joho the Blog
An Entry from the Archives

« White phosphorus || Back to Blog | Dan Bricklin's WikiCalc »

November 09, 2005

Miscellaneous news

Terry Heaton writes provocatively about the "unbundled newsroom":

...our essential mission is to first serve the information needs of our community throughout the day, and then to create programs that will summarize the news of the day. This means a fundamental change in our approach to the news, for the best way to meet the needs of people during the day is to create news in an unbundled form. No longer can we simply repurpose content that's created for a bundled program and distribute it elsewhere. On the contrary, our unbundled content is what should be repurposed to create our end-of-the-day summaries.

...field crews need tools for directly publishing to the Web, including text, stills, video, blogs, e-mail, cellphones, handhelds, and especially RSS. We need to see ourselves as pushing content at every turn in the creation and development of our journalism.

This is journalism made fully transparent. (There's much more in Terry's piece than those two snippets, btw.)

Terry sees the broadcast news programs as a rebundling of the bundles. I wonder whether the networks are going to be trusted as rebundlers worth listening to; already the editorial function has migrated to the Web to a remarkable degree for many of us. Why should we value the broadcasters' editorial judgment enough to enable them to stay afloat economically? And if the news programs fail, why will the news divisions continue to generate unbundled content?

I'm not saying I have an alternative.

[Tags: news media TerryHeaton EverythingIsMiscellaneous]

Posted by D. Weinberger at November 9, 2005 11:33 AM


Comments

There's a difference between info-saturation and journalism. "Broadcast news" at its best conveys information remarkably like (but not actually) journalism. And it is seldom at its best. To suggest that saturation of available media with bundled journo-packets will be anything better is very optimistic. I think we should leave journalism to the journalists and not confuse them - the journalists - with media producers, or anchor-folks, or vloggers, or bloggers, or bears.

There's more to "news" than immediacy.

Posted by: fp | November 9, 2005 05:06 PM


Is thus, true quite good!!!

Posted by: 手机图片下载 | November 9, 2005 08:50 PM


Thahk you,
It's very intresting :)

Posted by: Nicolette | November 11, 2005 06:37 AM


it was horribly bad

Posted by: sammie dsfh fdsfsdfdf | January 5, 2006 02:45 PM


Post a comment

Guidelines for Commenting

Basically, you can say what you want. (Click here for the fine print.)

If you haven't left a comment here before, your comment may be put into a queue for me to approve. Sorry for the delay. Blame the damn spammers.