Joho the Blog
|
|
|
January 26, 2007
Mitchell Baker has posted a draft of the Mozilla Manifesto. (There's discussion of it here.) Here are the principles:
There isn't a sentence in it with which I disagree. And that's the problem. It's not disagreeable enough. I can imagine all sorts of organizations that I think are doing harm to the Net signing onto the first five principles without even checking with marketing first. The only two that would give anyone pause are #6 and #7 (although the telcos would have to do claim that—as per #5—making international phone calls counts as "decentralized participation worldwide"). Even then, they could say they are happy to have other people doing open source work, because that's part of the balance that #9 endorses. So, I guess I'd be more enthusiastic about the principles if they had more bite. Name the threats to principles #1-5. Declare that its openness in process and standards should make open source software the first choice to be considered when organizations serving the public good are making software decisions. Denounce the use of software patents. I hate to be, well, disagreeable about a set of principles I agree with, produced by a group I admire and whose software I use and am grateful for every day, but imo the manifesto needs to be more than a pat on the back and a big group hug. [Tags: open_source mozilla digital_rights everything_is_miscellaneous] Posted
by D. Weinberger at January 26, 2007 12:10 PM
|
Comments
Your post and this item both deserve more than this, but I'm out the door.
Perhaps this shows the distinction of "manifesto" from "plan of action" ... the principles are fine, but they're abstract.
cheers
Posted by: Ben Tremblay | January 26, 2007 03:46 PM