Joho the Blog
An Entry from the Archives

« Missing the point about DailyKos || Back to Blog | Literary audio limericks »

August 03, 2007

Shirtless Disclosure - Need to know

Why have we never seen a photo of George W. Bush as president without his shirt on?

In 2005, when Bush interviewed Judge J. Harvie Wikinson III as a possible nominee for the Supreme Court, not only did he ask him how much he exercised, but when the Judge said he ran 3.5 miles a day, Bush urged him to start doing some cross-training. [source]

The Washington Post casually refers to "Bush's two-hour midday exercise sessions" [source].

He runs a 7 minute mile. At least he did when he became president. [source]

Laura says he exercises at least five days a week. [source]

Bush's physician explained that Bush fainted while choking on a pretzel because his resting heart rate is 38-49 beats per minute. [source] A normal rate for an adult is 60-100. [source]

So, what is Bush hiding under his shirt (other than a mysterious rectangular piece of equipment)?

We saw President Clinton shirtless.

Bill Clinton shirtless

We saw President Reagan shirtless.

Ronald Reagan shirtless - image from http://www.medaloffreedom.com/

Why haven't we seen President Bush shirtless?

Could it be because the American public isn't ready for just how many crunches per day it takes for Bush to exorcise his inner demons?

Bush shirtless (artists rendition) - photo by savemejebus at Flickr, creative common licensed

Come, on W. We demand to see you shirtless! The public has a right to know!

[Tags: bush politics humor]

Posted by D. Weinberger at August 3, 2007 02:26 PM


Comments

We need a petition.

Posted by: Serrin Ling | August 3, 2007 04:32 PM


Maybe he should take his shirt off to prove his "manful"ness (see previous post). Ugh - can we get a little critical thinking about masculinity around here? Sorry to not laugh at your "humor" this time!

Posted by: Marshall Kirkpatrick | August 3, 2007 04:43 PM


God NO! Are you crazy? That's like opening the 7th seal or something.

Posted by: beth | August 3, 2007 05:17 PM


Marshall, did you not see my parenthetical (or perhaps just pathetic) attempt to undercut the "manfully" adjective in my previous post? I used the word carefully. And I hardly think this post (the buff W one) is promoting the virtues of traditional masculinity Jeez!

Posted by: David Weinberger | August 3, 2007 11:51 PM


Seems like they're reading your blog over in Russia... :-)

Posted by: JKE | August 14, 2007 07:56 PM


Post a comment

Guidelines for Commenting

Basically, you can say what you want. (Click here for the fine print.)

If you haven't left a comment here before, your comment may be put into a queue for me to approve. Sorry for the delay. Blame the damn spammers.