Joho the Blog
An Entry from the Archives

That's a good question, and it's a real quandry. After all, the conservative movement in the 1970's started with direct mail, which did outreach and empowerment to the grassroots based on information provided from think tanks and public non-profits.

Wikinomics (the book) talks about the Net Generation coming out of our schools. They grew up on the Net watching and helping to build the Web 2.0 tools that we are using as a foundation for our own tools. I think that's part of the answer. The youth who are engaged and have educated themselves are seeing a world going crazy, and we want to fight against the destruction of our world by becoming a counter to the powers that be. In the 70's the Democrats were the powers. In the 2000's, it's the Republicans. I think it also comes down to the definition of progressive. To me it means populist, but only almost.

More later...

David, my gut tells me that the mission is at odds with conservatism. The part about exposing "patterns of private influence on public events" as if that is a bad thing. Conservatives, or people who self-identify as such, tend to be less wary of "private interests" if, by that, you mena "corporations."

I think our problems are not due to conservative versus liberal, but to integrity and courage versus something not quite the opposite, but close to opposite of integrity and courage..

Shallow Journalism
Seventh Judicial Circuit (Flagler, Putnam, St. Johns, and Volusia Counties)
for the State of Florida
January 14, 2007
Dwight Hines

The State Attorney for the Seventh Judicial Circuit in Florida is Mr. John Tanner. Mr. Tanner was recently the target of a grand jury investigation directed by Mr. Harry Shorstein, the Florida State Attorney for the Fourth Judicial Circuit. Although the grand jury did not produce any criminal indictments of Mr. Tanner, it did write a summary of their findings that is currently under seal in the Circuit Court of Volusia County, Daytona Beach, Florida. Mr. Tanner has successfully argued, through his attorney, that the results of the grand jury investigation should be sealed forever and, worse, has argued successfully that all future motions in this case be sealed. The judge has agreed.

It appears now that State Attorney Tanner, who was elected by the people, does not trust the people to evaluate information from a grand jury composed of people. It appears that State Attorney Tanner, who is the highest ranking law enforcement officer in the Seventh Judicial Circuit, does not want to be governed by those parts of the Constitution of the State of Florida that guarantee the right of citizens to public information. I believe a fair interpretation because it is supported by other facts, like the rampant violations of Chapter 119, Fla. Stat. (2006), Florida Public Records law in the City of St. Augustine, the County of St. Johns, and the St. Johns County Mosquito Control Board that are not investigated or prosecuted by Mr. Tanner. These facts turn ugly when you realize that there are false affidavits filed in the Circuit Court in St. Johns County that swear the City of St. Augustine has purchased, and uses, computers unable to memorialize information and has computers that unable to print out information because the information is not “memorialized".

It might be time to note that the newly elected Governor of Florida, Charlie Crist, has created an Office of Open Government to help the people find out about what the government of the State of Florida, and the local governments in Florida are doing, and to ensure compliance by local and state government with Florida Open Records laws. Ms. Pat Gleason, who wrote the book on Open Government in Florida, who has worked thousands of hours over the years conducting seminars, engaging in mediation between government agencies and private citizens to resolve conflicts on obtaining government records, and serving as General Counsel to then Florida Attorney General Charlie Crist, will be Director of Cabinet Affairs. Joann Carrin, with experience in prosecuting organized crime, will be the Director of Open Government. If you believe that open government is essential to democracy, they are a dream team.

Parallel to the announcement of an Office of Open Government by Governor Crist, nearly in time but completely in substance, was the determination by the United States Center for Medicare and Medicaid that they will be publishing hospitals’ heart attack and heart failure mortality rates on the internet. The decision will impact not only hospitals and emergency care providers but on a hospital’s larger communities — all the potential and real consumers of their services. Not to be forgotten in this increasingly transparent soup we call healthy democracy, is the new California law that requires hospitals to report many of the adverse incidents that happen to patients. These are all reasons for celebration, if you trust the people to make good decisions when they have adequate information.

There are more exciting events in the incredible amounts of new transparency in the United States — the release by the Federal government of tons of documents on December 31, 2006, that were classified 25 years ago. President Bush did not block the release of these records and deserves our respect for that decision. It has never been done before on such a scale by us or anyone else and it is a continuing process. Paranoids, eat your hearts out.

The Securities and Exchange Commission rule now in effect that requires benefits paid to higher management be publicly disclosed if they are greater than ten thousand dollars in value per year is wonderful and will have a stabilizing effect on our financial system, increasing the robust confidence of investors for local governments that use Municipal Bonds to raise money. Imagine investing your money in places where they not only don’t report any vulnerabilities, but pay for country club memberships and other perks for their executives.

There is little doubt now that a good part of the reasons for the poor level of compliance with the Florida Open Records Act in St. Johns County is due to the tone set by the leadership of Mr. Tanner — the constitution of Florida is fine and dandy, but don’t use the right to access public information against me or other government officials. Such an attitude and such behaviors in any elected official is unacceptable, but when committed by the highest law enforcement person in the Circuit, by a person who has sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution of the State of Florida, it is perverse.

It is time for the Governor to appoint another special prosecutor, one charged with the specific tasks of investigating violations of the Florida Rules of Administration, Rule 1B-26.003 and violations of Chapter 119, Fla. Stat. (2006), as well as any perjury, abuse of office, witness tampering, and obstruction of justice that precedes, accompanies, or follows violations of Rule 1B and Chapter 119.

While citizens wait for the appointment of a special prosecutor by Executive Order, it would be a good idea for private, ordinary citizens to file a motion in the Circuit Court in Volusia County to intervene in the current controversy between the two state attorneys, if they can not afford an attorney. I would accompany the motion to intervene with a motion for the court to unseal all documents produced by the grand jury, and to unseal any motions made by either side, or others thus far, and to forego sealing any other documents related to the present controversy. I would include in the second motion that any arguments on motions or hearings must be held in public, as the constitution requires, unless adequate public notice is given to all interested parties and individuals in the Seventh Judicial Circuit. However, I can not give legal advice so you would be wiser to write your local media and ask why they are not demanding the grand jury report be released.

I don't know why Mr. Tanner is fighting the publication of the grand jury report. Obviously, he did not commit any criminal acts because he was not indicted. Maybe he feels he will be embarrassed by his behaviors, like the sheriff in another county who was found to be charging lingerie for his mistress on the county charge card. Maybe he doesn’t want anyone to know that he might have told some of his assistants not to prosecute public records violations because they were not ‘real’ crimes. Maybe, only maybe, Mr. Tanner told his employees not to prosecute his good supporters if they only committed perjury or obstruction of justice when they were failing to comply with those irritating public records requests. I hope those are not true, but what we know is true is that Mr. Tanner, with all his resources and access to the media to present his side and his interpretation of the facts, is afraid to trust the people to discern good information from bad, to tell fact from fiction. The fear of common people being too ignorant to judge their leaders, or themselves, does not feel good when it comes from someone who is in charge of a justice system in four counties that is based on openness and verdicts by juries.

Ah yes, shallow journalism is when not a single newspaper or broadcast station has filed motions to unseal the records and to block sealing of records, but this coming March, during Sunshine Week, these traditional media people will write and speak effusively about the importance of a free press and the right of access to public information. This is so shallow it is painful and the people hurt the most are those who think and who believe that biased justice is the best we can do.

the right has all the power in america. the "center" is a long way to the right. the democrats are not progressives. barack is voting for bills to turn coal into diesel. hilary is so desperate to look tough she is in a real corner. you still have folks talking about the liberal bias of the MSM. but the US MSM is a long way down the dial. if you don't have a voice, and you're concerned about the future, that's a powerful constraint, which creates innovation. american is calibrated pretty far to the right. its no surprise i think progressives feel the need to find new methods.

To be conservative is, by definition, to try to keep things the way they are (or were, in some idealized golden age). This requires walls, gates, locks, secrecy--all the implements of "security."

To be progressive is, by definition, to progress beyond what is currently the status quo to what is "new." This requires risk, which presupposes an abandoning of security. Open doors, transparency, embracing the technology and community that can get you through the wilderness.

It's a fundamental clash of worldviews. "Open Government" is probably seen by conservatives as something frightening, not something with the power to help them. "You mean ANYONE can participate? Even people I don't like? That's unacceptable!"

Remember the subtle difference between the words "Republican" and "Democrat." A true democrat believes that the people should own the entire process. A true republican believes that only highly-qualified people should "represent" the people, and make the decisions they can't make for themselves. Unfortunately, our government is the later.

Perhaps the true revolution from the Net-Generation will be the arrival the direct democracy promised but not delivered at the inception of our nation. No electors, no congress--just the vote of the majority.

Wow. That's scary.

@Neal: majority rule would be an abject disaster. I want the minority protected from the tyranny of the majority!

Didn't Convio come under fire a while back for doing business with religious anti-gay groups? There was a dailykos thread about it here:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/6/3/174432/0498

And now that Convio has acquired GetActive, I think that raises some questions about the future of the commercial turnkey solutions that many left-leaning and non-partisan nonprofits rely on. Those who don't have the comfort level or technical facility to use open source solutions may simply become part of an "advocacy market" which is more of a market and less of a conversation.