Joho the Blog
An Entry from the Archives

« On reading the reviews of Snakes on a Plane || Back to Blog | Consumer Internet Bill of Rights »

August 19, 2006

Two reasons Snakes on a Plane is cool

[Note: I know the following is dangerously close to self-parody. But I do think the Snakes on a Plane phenomenon is interesting.]

1. Remember how we all made Mahir, the Kiss man, famous? Some people spread the link out of a mean sense of superiority. (Mahir used his moment of celebrity to try to engage people across cultures, so now who's the foolish one, eh?) But we also spread it because we could. We — all of us, each of us, none of us famous — could make an unknown human famous. It changed our relationship to celebrity, the continued existence of Paris Hilton not to the contrary.

With Snakes on a Plane, we're flexing our muscles in a new way. We're not insisting that JarJar be killed in the sequel, although we did write the movie's most quotable line. But that's cool only because it means with SoaP we're messing with the audience's relationship to the movie, and not just - as with Rocky Horror - during the time when the movie unspools in the theater. Rather, with SoaP the audience has taken over the meaning of the movie. This is very different from being asked to design Indiana Jones' new outfit or write witticisms for the next James Bond movie. We, without being asked, have insisted on what this movie means to us.

What does it mean to us? Well, we're refusing to let the movie be marketed to us as B movies — think Anaconda — are, as if we're idiots who really think such movies are anything more than a retelling of the same plot over and over and over. With SoaP we're saying that we know exactly what sort of movie it is, and we're capable of enjoying it for the very qualities that make it a B movie. Don't think we're really surprised when a snake bites the guy on the nuts, as I assume happens, even if we jump because of the clever editing. We all knew someone would get bitten in the crotch, and we've always been conspirators in the success of B movies. Now we're making that clear by reveling in our power, just as we did with Mahir.

I don't think this is a turning point in how movies are made. The SoaP phenomenon has gotten much of its juice from the fact that this is the first time. Hollywood I'm sure is already trying to figure out how to repeat the success. But that's like Hollywood plotting to find the next Mahir. Nah, Hollywood will continue, and we'll find the next project we want to commandeer because, after all...[cue portentious music] aren't we all the snakes on the plane?

2. Samuel L. Jackson. [Tags: snakes_on_a_plane SoaP movies pretentious_writing]

Posted by D. Weinberger at August 19, 2006 01:17 PM


Comments

Could you explain more? This is the first time I couldn't follow something you've written. Perhaps I'm just "out of it" (hough I've seen the t.v. ads and read the NYTimes review and know the critics weren't allowed to preview it).

In talking about the audience's participation in the movie experience, are you referring strictly to the refusal to let the movie be marketed to "us" as a "B" movie--or were there other aspects to the phenomenon?

What "power" are we reveling in and how is the revelry being manifest? Thanks most sincerely.

Posted by: Chicagogal | August 19, 2006 07:00 PM


P.S. What do you mean about "the first time," i.e., the first time for what?

Posted by: Chicagogal | August 19, 2006 07:08 PM


Chicagogal, sorry to be obscure. In part it's due to bad writing but most of it is due to my not really knowing what I'm trying to say. I conflated two points.

1. It seems to me that with SoaP, the audience has explicitly taken over the traditional role of the marketers, which has been to tell us how to take the movie.

2. In terms of the specifics of how, in this case, the market is taking the movie: We're taking it as a B movie that succeeds by not pretending to be more than it is. The marketers should learn that they can stop trying to inflate the importance of their products.

I hope that helps.

Posted by: David Weinberger [TypeKey Profile Page] | August 20, 2006 11:54 AM


This sounds like an example for - if I can believe Wikipedia - Semiotic Democracy in the original sense conceived by Fiske (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiotic_democracy). In my opinion, what's new about SoaP is that people have begun to construe their own version of the movie's meaning before it came out, and thus influenced some of its content in an unsolicited way.

Posted by: Daniel H. | August 21, 2006 10:10 AM


Thanks for the clarification.

Posted by: Chicagogal | August 23, 2006 01:48 AM


I have always loved B movies and think it is great how SoaP has taken off. Because of it I have started renting other B movies with snakes and planes as the theme. My favorite so far has been Boa vs Python. Simple, camp, fun.

Posted by: Jo | August 26, 2006 03:29 AM


Post a comment

Guidelines for Commenting

Basically, you can say what you want. (Click here for the fine print.)

If you haven't left a comment here before, your comment may be put into a queue for me to approve. Sorry for the delay. Blame the damn spammers.