Joho the Blog
|
|
|
December 13, 2005
Why doesn't our government have its own estimate of how many Iraqis have died? Isn't that a key piece of information as you're assessing a war? Or do we really care so little that we don't bother tracking, counting or estimating dead Iraqi civilians? [Tags: iraq GeorgeBush] Posted
by D. Weinberger at December 13, 2005 10:53 AM
|
Comments
I'm going to write about this in more detail today, David, but let me point you to "What's in a Number?", an excellent episode of "This American Life" which tried to answer this question
The show took a very close look at a statistical study that estimated - over a year ago - that there had been at 98,000 civilian deaths in Iraq, mostly from US bombs. Ira Glass and crew ask some very interesting questions about why this study was so widely dismissed, why it's so hard to count civilian casualities and what sort of obligations we have to count the civilian dead. Very much worth listening to...
Posted by: EthanZ | December 13, 2005 11:29 AM
This administration has taken the old adage, "If you don't want to know, don't ask the question," and made it a central part of its policy formulation process.
Posted by: david rogers | December 14, 2005 10:07 AM